[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#65619: marked as done (vchkpw: vpopmail nonexisting)



Your message dated Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:44:44 +0000
with message-id <20020225024444.GA21918@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Bug#65619: vchkpw: vpopmail nonexisting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2000 05:25:21 +0000
>From frock@vantemis.cokeland.dk Wed Jun 14 00:25:21 2000
Return-path: <frock@vantemis.cokeland.dk>
Received: from vantemis.cokeland.dk [212.242.74.82] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 1325g0-00033N-00; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:25:20 -0500
Received: (qmail 21932 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jun 2000 05:25:17 -0000
Date: 14 Jun 2000 05:25:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20000614052517.21930.qmail@vantemis.cokeland.dk>
From: Rapmonster <frock@cokeland.dk>
Subject: vchkpw: vpopmail nonexisting
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.3
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: vchkpw
Version: 3.1.2-7
Severity: normal

in /etc/cron.daily/vchkpw it runs vpopmail
but vpopmail is not to find anywhere on the system

I did (as root) "find / -name vpopmail" and found no occurrences at all.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux vantemis 2.2.13 #6 Mon Jun 5 19:52:04 CEST 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages vchkpw depends on:
ii  libc6          2.1.3-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  qmail          1.03-14        Secure, reliable, efficient, simple mail tra
ii  ucspi-tcp      0.84-1         tools for building TCP client-server applica
ii  perl-5.004     5.004.05-6     Larry Wall's Practical Extracting and Report
	^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 65619-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2002 02:45:13 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Sun Feb 24 20:45:13 2002
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16fB8a-0002tW-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:45:12 -0600
Received: from host217-35-46-127.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.46.127] helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
	by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 16fB8Z-0004MZ-00
	for 65619-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:45:11 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16fB89-0005j7-00
	for <65619-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:44:45 +0000
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:44:44 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 65619-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#65619: vchkpw: vpopmail nonexisting
Message-ID: <20020225024444.GA21918@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 65619-done@bugs.debian.org

On 14 Jun 2000 at 05:25:17 -0000, Rapmonster wrote:
> Package: vchkpw
> Version: 3.1.2-7
> Severity: normal
> 
> in /etc/cron.daily/vchkpw it runs vpopmail
> but vpopmail is not to find anywhere on the system
> 
> I did (as root) "find / -name vpopmail" and found no occurrences at all.

That's OK. /etc/cron.daily/vchkpw does 'su - vpopmail -c
/usr/lib/vchkpw/vchkexpire'. That is, it runs /usr/lib/vchkpw/vchkexpire
(which does exist) as the user 'vpopmail', rather than running some
command called vpopmail.

I'm closing this bug now; sorry it took so long for anybody to get back
to you.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: