On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:24:48PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote: > Just curiousity: is it a RC bug to declare a program i386 only when nothing > really justify it (beside a long list of upstream portability bugs) ? I guess there are cases where the best solution is just to cut down the Architecture: list. I don't know if clisp is in such a bad state anyway. My opinion is that if it's useful but it's really hard to make it work in all arches, it shouldn't go from all just because it doesn't build on some. But this should be applied to really severe portability problems, where to draw the line is another story. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in || jordi@sindominio.net || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos de Leyenda || jordi@debian.org || http://debian.org http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
Attachment:
pgpu49XTTocbM.pgp
Description: PGP signature