Re: ITP->RFP

[Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?

No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're welcome to ignore:

	* consider tagging packages with legal issues as "wontfix" and making
	  them RFP's
	* consider tagging packages that have beta things up on the web
	  somewhere for download as "pending" and letting them stay around
	  a bit longer
	* consider doing these in batches of 50 or so, announcing them to
	  -devel-announce once a week so people can look through them and
	  claim them if they want them

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

The daffodils are coming. Are you?
      linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
                                --- http://linux.conf.au/