Bug#108567: xinetd
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:50:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > I believe it to have been fixed in an easrlier version of xinetd, such that
> > the current unstable/testing version 1:2.3.0-1 should not have the issue
> > you described (I couldn't reproduce it).
> it should have been fixed in the new upstream. i can test that, but i
> plan to go back to netkit inetd per Solar Designer's comments on bugtraq...
I am uploading 2.3.3 so that should be okay. I think 2.3.3 has all of
Solar Designer's patches finally applied. I would go back to inetd, but I
need the ip:port separation :( - So I adoped *grin*
> > Could you please check this out and close the bug if it is indeed done?
> i will, whenever penguinppc comes back.
> > I did email eb@penguinppc.org but it had delivery failures :(
> yes, its moving to a new hosting provider at the moment (im not sure
> how long that is going to take), eb@penguinppc.org goes to this
> address normally anyway.
Aah - okay - thanks
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/
Hostmaster, Webmaster, and Chief Code Wibbler Digital-Scurf Unlimited
GPG Public key available from germany.keyserver.net KeyId: 20687895
How untasteful can you get?
Reply to: