Bug#25717: marked as done (Weired FAQ-o-matic problem)
Your message dated 15 Aug 2001 06:56:23 +0200
with message-id <87snetkjk8.fsf@om.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>
and subject line [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 1998 15:29:07 +0000
Received: (qmail 8599 invoked from network); 14 Aug 1998 15:29:03 -0000
Received: from ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de (steinke@132.230.75.22)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 14 Aug 1998 15:29:03 -0000
Received: from localhost (steinke@localhost)
by ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id RAA10521
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 17:29:00 +0200 (METDST)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 17:28:59 +0200 (METDST)
From: Lars Steinke <steinke@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Weired FAQ-o-matic problem
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.980814171048.10506B-100000@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: faqomatic
Version: 2.603-1
There seems to be a bug in 2.603-1 which wasn't there in 2.602-3.
Since I upgraded I could not start my FAQ-o-matic as
http://whatever/cgi-bin/fom, it would only display when using
authentication (?auth=...).
If called without cookie it just causes the browser to reload the page
over and over without ever displaying anything !
Now that I switched back to 0.602 it all works nicely again...
Using Debian 2.0, kernel 2.0.34, perl 5.004_04 and apache-ssl 1.2.6+1.16.
Regards,
/(__ __|\ Lars Steinke, Research Student @
( \/ __)_ www.fmf.uni-freiburg.de, Germany
) (_____ / for PGP PKey and WWW-Page finger
/___________/ steinke@mibm.ruf.uni-freiburg.de
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 25717-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2001 04:52:19 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Tue Aug 14 23:52:19 2001
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15WsfD-0007Zf-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 23:52:19 -0500
Received: from om (asy141.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.128.149])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA19540
for <25717-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:49:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by om with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15WsjJ-0008Ul-00
for <25717-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:56:33 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 25717-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
Date: 15 Aug 2001 06:56:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87snetkjk8.fsf@om.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>
Lines: 79
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@om>
Delivered-To: 25717-done@bugs.debian.org
--=-=-=
The submitter is unreachable:
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:57:19 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: steinke@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org>
To: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:55:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. The following address(es) failed:
steinke@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de:
unrouteable mail domain "ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de"
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from gecko by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Wanq-00014J-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:48:02 -0500
Subject: Bug#25717: Weired FAQ-o-matic problem
Reply-To: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>, 25717-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Orignal-Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@om>
Resent-To: Lars Steinke <steinke@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de>
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:48:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25717.U25717.9977817692986@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 25717
X-Debian-PR-Package: faqomatic
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 25717-submitter@bugs.debian.org id=U25717.9977817692986
(code U ref 25717); Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:48:02 GMT
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 25717-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Date: 14 Aug 2001 10:23:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.980814171048.10506B-100000@ciphp12.physik.uni-freibu
Message-ID: <87y9onuk27.fsf@om.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@om>
Delivered-To: 25717-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: owner@bugs.debian.org
tags 25717 + moreinfo
thanks
Lars Steinke <steinke@ciphp12.physik.uni-freiburg.de> writes:
> Package: faqomatic
> Version: 2.603-1
>
> There seems to be a bug in 2.603-1 which wasn't there in 2.602-3.
> Since I upgraded I could not start my FAQ-o-matic as
> http://whatever/cgi-bin/fom, it would only display when using
> authentication (?auth=...).
> If called without cookie it just causes the browser to reload the page
> over and over without ever displaying anything !
>
> Now that I switched back to 0.602 it all works nicely again...
>
> Using Debian 2.0, kernel 2.0.34, perl 5.004_04 and apache-ssl 1.2.6+1.16.
I know it's been a while, but can you try version 2.711 from unstable?
Thanks!
Matej
----- End forwarded message -----
--=-=-=--
Reply to: