Bug#94982: marked as done (libliteclue1: file conflicts with liblitecle and libliteclue1-dev - `/usr/X11R6/lib/libLiteClue.so')
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
with message-id <20010802142653.C12397@flatline.org.uk>
and subject line libliteclue bugs fixed by QA uploads
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2001 14:11:08 +0000
>From elw@stderr.org Mon Apr 23 09:11:08 2001
Return-path: <elw@stderr.org>
Received: from aph.frognet.net [216.3.3.138] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14rh3U-00004y-00; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:11:08 -0500
Received: from dns1.stderr.org (elw@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f3NEBGGc018927;
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:11:16 -0400
Received: (from elw@localhost)
by dns1.stderr.org (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id f3NEBGRa018864;
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:11:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:11:16 -0400
Message-Id: <200104231411.f3NEBGRa018864@dns1.stderr.org>
From: elijah wright <elw@stderr.org>
Subject: libliteclue1: file conflicts with liblitecle and libliteclue1-dev - `/usr/X11R6/lib/libLiteClue.so'
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: libliteclue1
Version: N/A
Severity: important
see subject line- this is a packaging error, mostly.
elijah
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dns1 2.4.2-686 #1 Mon Mar 12 05:57:25 EST 2001 i686 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 94982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2001 13:26:54 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Thu Aug 02 08:26:54 2001
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from (mccoy.flatline.org.uk) [::ffff:195.8.181.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15SIV4-0002dN-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:26:54 -0500
Received: from cjw44 by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15SIV3-0003IT-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
To: 94982-done@bugs.debian.org, 95066-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libliteclue bugs fixed by QA uploads
Message-ID: <20010802142653.C12397@flatline.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 94982-done@bugs.debian.org
libliteclue is orphaned, and these bugs were fixed by QA Group uploads
some time ago. As such, I'm closing them now.
libliteclue (1.2.16-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
* The 'renaming sucks' release
* Aargh. libliteclue-dev should conflict with libliteclue
too. (Closes: Bug#95066)
-- Gergely Nagy <8@free.bsd.hu> Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:00:17 +0200
libliteclue (1.2.16-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Conflict with old libliteclue (Closes: Bug#94982)
-- Gergely Nagy <8@free.bsd.hu> Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:47:33 +0200
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: