Re: Changing maintainer field for QA.

To: packages@qa.debian.org
Subject: Re: Changing maintainer field for QA.
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:02:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010405220233.A2358@fisch.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010404031930.D14001@marvin.palfrader.org>; from weasel@debian.org on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:19:30AM +0200
References: <[🔎] 20010404031930.D14001@marvin.palfrader.org> <[🔎] XFMail.20010404093039.shaleh@valinux.com> <[🔎] 20010404031930.D14001@marvin.palfrader.org>

* Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> [20010404 03:19]:
> Maybe we should stop using <debian-qa@lists.d.o> as a Maintainer:
> address for packages maintained by QA and use somthing like
> <packages@qa.debian.org>.

OK, I have created a forwarding alias.  I will post an announcement
to d-d-a soon.

* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com> [20010404 09:30]:
> BTW we need to ensure the documentation in Debian explains the
> orphaning procedure and the correct email address to use.

Yeah, while I was trying to update the documentation I noticed how bad
it is...

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- Changing maintainer field for QA.
  - From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- RE: Changing maintainer field for QA.
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: osh_1.7-7.1_i386.changes INSTALLED
Next by Date: Re: osh: changed maintainer to debian-qa
Previous by thread: RE: Changing maintainer field for QA.
Next by thread: pclock_0.13.1-1_i386.changes INSTALLED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread