Bug#111147: marked as done (imaptool_0.9-2 fails to autobuild on m68k)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2001 14:57:30 -0400
with message-id <E15fnII-0002I8-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#111080: fixed in imaptool 0.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2001 03:18:52 +0000
>From rick@def.debian.net Mon Sep 03 22:18:52 2001
Return-path: <rick@def.debian.net>
Received: from h24-78-159-201.vc.shawcable.net (def.debian.net) [24.78.159.201]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15e6jk-0000Z5-00; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 22:18:52 -0500
Received: from rick by def.debian.net with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
id 15e6jj-0006rb-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:18:51 -0700
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:18:51 -0700
From: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: imaptool_0.9-2 fails to autobuild on m68k
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010903201851.A26342@def.debian.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Sender: Rick Younie <rick@def.debian.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: imaptool
Version: 0.9-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
The autobuilder found missing build dependencies for imaptool_0.9-2
libxaw7-dev
| Automatic build of imaptool_0.9-2 on slam by sbuild/m68k 1.159
| Build started at 20010903-1946
| ******************************************************************************
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Need to get 33.5kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://141.213.4.21 unstable/main imaptool 0.9-2 (dsc) [623B]
| Get:2 http://141.213.4.21 unstable/main imaptool 0.9-2 (tar) [30.9kB]
| Get:3 http://141.213.4.21 unstable/main imaptool 0.9-2 (diff) [1943B]
| Fetched 33.5kB in 5s (5595B/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper, xlibs-dev, libjpeg62-dev
| **** Warning:
| **** The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
| libxaw7-dev (>> 4.1.0)
...
| make
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/imaptool-0.9'
| gcc -I/usr/X11R6/include/ -c imaptool.c
| imaptool.c:27: X11/Xaw/Label.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:28: X11/Xaw/Box.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:29: X11/Xaw/Form.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:30: X11/Xaw/Command.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:31: X11/Xaw/SimpleMenu.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:32: X11/Xaw/MenuButton.h: No such file or directory
| imaptool.c:33: X11/Xaw/SmeBSB.h: No such file or directory
| make[1]: *** [imaptool.o] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/imaptool-0.9'
| make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
The full log is available for a week at
http://slam.debian.net/buildd/logs/imaptool_0.9-2_20010903-1946
then gets archived to http://bruno.fmepnet.org/buildd
Rick
--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 111080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2001 19:19:01 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sat Sep 08 14:19:01 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15fnd7-0003Tp-00; Sat, 08 Sep 2001 14:19:01 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15fnII-0002I8-00; Sat, 08 Sep 2001 14:57:30 -0400
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 111080-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.57 $
Subject: Bug#111080: fixed in imaptool 0.9-3
Message-Id: <E15fnII-0002I8-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 14:57:30 -0400
Delivered-To: 111080-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
imaptool, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
imaptool_0.9-3.dsc
to pool/main/i/imaptool/imaptool_0.9-3.dsc
imaptool_0.9-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/i/imaptool/imaptool_0.9-3_i386.deb
imaptool_0.9-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/i/imaptool/imaptool_0.9-3.diff.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 111080@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated imaptool package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 03:02:55 +0100
Source: imaptool
Binary: imaptool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description:
imaptool - A tool for creating client-side image maps
Closes: 111080 111147
Changes:
imaptool (0.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add build-dependency on libxaw7-dev (closes: #111080, #111147).
Files:
52d001b8b9312fd95c1e0353e0472b6a 636 web optional imaptool_0.9-3.dsc
80214b82532ebb0c5548deef42d44339 2028 web optional imaptool_0.9-3.diff.gz
7257267e48a02f193d42e50561479e0a 17134 web optional imaptool_0.9-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7mX1a9t0zAhD6TNERAplOAJsEVFdfdBCeUNagqzs6TG8HDKKyJgCdHGn/
HbVQ6qZhIqgvfH1Mk5FIzAo=
=JR17
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: