Re: successful installation with 2.3.5 boot-floppies
- To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Cc: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, debian-testing@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: successful installation with 2.3.5 boot-floppies
- From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:56:05 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010612235605.A2600@codepoet.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>, Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, debian-testing@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: andersen@codepoet.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] oa3d95use6.fsf@arroz.fake>; from adam@onshore.com on Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:37:21PM -0400
- References: <20010608102657.A22592@opensource.lineo.com> <20010608102350.D333@ogun.gordian.com> <20010608120449.B22981@opensource.lineo.com> <20010610005715.C15814@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] oa3d95use6.fsf@arroz.fake>
On Tue Jun 12, 2001 at 08:37:21PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> > they're allowed to have special instructions that you have to carry out
> > very precisely ("Switch to VC 2, type this confusing sed command... Before
> > rebooting, switch to VC 2, and chmod these directories like so..."),
> > all they have to do is be usable to install a functional woody system.
>
> Yah -- the bad bug still outstanding is the busybox tar problem, which
> is causing a *VERY* insecure system to be produced.
This is not an outstanding bug. It was fixed in busybox 1:0.51-7 which
was uploaded on June 4th. busybox 1:0.51-8 was installed into the archive
yesterday...
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org, andersen@lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
Reply to: