On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs,
> > Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the
> > link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes
> > to render the page ]
>
> Interesting, but not perfect yet. :-) It seems to be missing non-free
> from its db of packages or something; witness
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?package=abuse -- says abuse-sfx is not
> available on any arches, when in fact it is an arch all package that
> madison shows in is every version of debian.
I've now added support for all three sections (main, contrib, non-free)
to debcheck. This brought up more problems which where until now filed
as unsatisfied dependencies: Packages in main may not depend or recommend
stuff outside of main.
See http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=withinmain&arch=ANY for the
list of packages that violate this.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : By professionals,
| `. `' for professionals
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgp9bj5ygMskc.pgp
Description: PGP signature