[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91341: marked as done (error while loading shared libraries)



Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100
with message-id <20010331134934.A692@fisch.cyrius.com>
and subject line ical removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 00:36:27 +0000
>From shaulka@bezeqint.net Sun Mar 25 18:36:27 2001
Return-path: <shaulka@bezeqint.net>
Received: from m2.bezeqint.net [192.115.106.47] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14hKzj-0001bp-00; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:36:27 -0600
Received: from rakefet (clnt-7156.bezeqint.net [212.179.7.156] (may be forged))
	by m2.bezeqint.net (Mirapoint)
	with ESMTP id AAS00503;
	Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:36:27 GMT
Received: from shaul by rakefet with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
	id 14hKz9-000422-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:35:51 +0200
From: Shaul Karl <shaulka@bezeqint.net>
Subject: error while loading shared libraries
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <[🔎] E14hKz9-000422-00@rakefet>
Sender: Shaul Karl <shaul@rakefet>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:35:51 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: ical
Version: 2.2-9
Severity: normal

[02:33:14 /tmp]$ ical &
[1] 15492
[02:34:29 /tmp]$ 

[1]+  Stopped                 ical
[02:34:30 /tmp]$ fg
ical
ical: error while loading shared libraries: libtcl8.3.so: cannot load shared object file: No such file or directory
[02:34:32 /tmp]$ 

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux rakefet 2.2.17 #1 Tue Sep 19 18:49:29 IDT 2000 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages ical depends on:
ii  libc6          2.2.2-1        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libstdc++2.10- 2.95.3-6       The GNU stdc++ library
ii  tk8.3          8.3.2-4        The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.3 - Run-Ti
ii  xlibs          4.0.2-7        X Window System client libraries

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 86649-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2001 12:49:38 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sat Mar 31 06:49:38 2001
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14jKoz-0006Fo-00; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 06:49:37 -0600
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194])
	by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA00318;
	Sat, 31 Mar 2001 06:49:35 -0600
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C662322CBD; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 51269-done@bugs.debian.org, 51281-done@bugs.debian.org,
        51378-done@bugs.debian.org, 55491-done@bugs.debian.org,
        76022-done@bugs.debian.org, 86649-done@bugs.debian.org,
        90052-done@bugs.debian.org, 91341-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ical removed from Debian
Message-ID: <20010331134934.A692@fisch.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: 86649-done@bugs.debian.org

ical has been removed from Debian unstable and won't be released
with the next official release of Debian, codenamed "woody".

Reason: Requested by vela@; orphaned, bugs, previous maintainer
considers it obsoleted by better alternatives, dead upstream

Please switch to one of the following programs: korganizer, plan,
xcal, xcalendar-i18n, xdkcal

If you have questions about this, please contact me.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: