Bug#69165: marked as done (smail: Smail is broken out of the box)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:05:29 -0500
with message-id <E14S2kT-0003tx-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#69165: fixed in smail 3.2.0.111-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2000 05:34:53 +0000
>From baloo@ursine.dyndns.org Tue Aug 15 00:34:53 2000
Return-path: <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
Received: from c258444-a.potlnd1.or.home.com (ursine.dyndns.org) [::ffff:24.16.203.126]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13OZNF-0001Eg-00; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 00:34:53 -0500
Received: by ursine.dyndns.org
via sendmail from stdin
id <m13OZNE-003HWPC@ursine.dyndns.org> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <m13OZNE-003HWPC@ursine.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Drummond <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
Subject: smail: Smail is broken out of the box
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Bcc:
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: smail
Version: 3.2.0.111-2
Severity: grave
When sending in pine, I get the error [Mail not sent: .7.1 Permanent
failure logged.]
When I check /var/smail/logfile, I get
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote connection from (unknown)[UNKNOWN-IP]
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote EHLO: warning: questionable
operand: 'localhost': from localhost: Remote address PTR lookup failed
(Resolver Error 0 (no error)).
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote RSET: requested by localhost
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote RCPT
TO: localhost<no-sender-addr>: '<baloo@rotfl.com>' <baloo@rotfl.com>
recipient for sender 'baloo@ursine.dyndns.org' not
deliverable: (ERR_104) security violation: remote address 'UNKNOWN-IP' is
not permitted to relay mail
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote RSET: requested by localhost
08/14/2000 22:30:46: [2151] remote got QUIT from localhost.
This despite having a valid PTR for localhost that works just totally fine
with everything else, including the last stable version of smail. I've
tried tweeking the configs, removing the configs and running smailconfig
again, and just can't get it to work for outbound deliveries at all.
Oddly, local deliveries work fine.
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux ursine 2.2.16 #2 SMP Sat Aug 5 23:41:12 PDT 2000 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages smail depends on:
ii cron 3.0pl1-57 management of regular background processing
ii libc6 2.1.3-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libdb2 2.7.7-2 The Berkeley database routines (run-time fil
ii libident 0.22-2 simple RFC1413 client library - runtime
ii libwrap0 7.6-5 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
ii util-linux 2.10f-5.1 Miscellaneous system utilities.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 69165-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2001 20:16:02 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Feb 11 14:16:01 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14S2ue-0007sq-00; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:16:00 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14S2kT-0003tx-00; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:05:29 -0500
From: Hector Garcia <hector@scouts-es.org>
To: 69165-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#69165: fixed in smail 3.2.0.111-6
Message-Id: <E14S2kT-0003tx-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:05:29 -0500
Delivered-To: 69165-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
smail, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
smail_3.2.0.111-6.dsc
to pool/main/s/smail/smail_3.2.0.111-6.dsc
smail_3.2.0.111-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/smail/smail_3.2.0.111-6_i386.deb
smail_3.2.0.111-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/smail/smail_3.2.0.111-6.diff.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 69165@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hector Garcia <hector@scouts-es.org> (supplier of updated smail package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 20:15:45 +0100
Source: smail
Binary: smail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.0.111-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hector Garcia <hector@scouts-es.org>
Changed-By: Hector Garcia <hector@scouts-es.org>
Description:
smail - Electronic mail transport system.
Closes: 66595 69165 82202
Changes:
smail (3.2.0.111-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Adopted the package. (closes: #82202)
* Fixed DOS bug. Didn't send pacth to upstream author yet because I cannot
contact him. Now only accepts a maximun of 1024 bytes as stated
by RFC-1869. (closes: #66595)
* Making use of funtion available for current libident. (closes: #69165)
* Now uses dpkg-statoverride instead of dh_suidregister.
Files:
abf9ff5c54e18754e7f420497ae6255f 675 mail extra smail_3.2.0.111-6.dsc
583d47adddce43a9d4adf3e80b9d1b43 61207 mail extra smail_3.2.0.111-6.diff.gz
147d3cab88c1749bf06d02a1c0dc8fda 515672 mail extra smail_3.2.0.111-6_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6htnfMwsDi2xjdG0RAoFtAKCjqhS6BsXyng5tUAn+rJHJVOMvEwCg+uKC
vDSf0F4ZSs5WEZE7ztw45Lc=
=woFB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: