Bug#71147: marked as done (apsfilterconfig not allow HP694C under hpdj driver)
Your message dated Wed, 03 Jan 2001 14:52:48 -0500
with message-id <E14Dtxo-0008Rt-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#71147: fixed in apsfilter 6.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2000 10:58:21 +0000
>From hashao@shu.net.dhis.org Fri Sep 08 05:58:21 2000
Return-path: <hashao@shu.net.dhis.org>
Received: from imsp211.netvigator.com [::ffff:205.252.144.55]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13XLrQ-0005RI-00; Fri, 08 Sep 2000 05:58:21 -0500
Received: from shu.dhis.org (postfix@pcd076186.netvigator.com [203.198.144.186])
by imsp211.netvigator.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA06381;
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 18:58:09 +0800 (HKT)
Received: by shu.dhis.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0CE593A5D2; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 18:54:39 +0800 (HKT)
From: ha shao <hashao@china.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apsfilterconfig not allow HP694C under hpdj driver
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.2
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.2
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 18:54:39 +0800
Message-Id: <20000908105439.0CE593A5D2@shu.dhis.org>
Sender: hashao@shu.net.dhis.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: apsfilter
Version: 5.1.4-1
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux king 2.2.17 #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 01:55:39 HKT 2000 i686
Versions of packages apsfilter depends on:
ii file 3.28-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gawk [awk] 1:3.0.4-4 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii lprng 3.6.24-2 lpr/lpd printer spooling system
ii lprng [lpr] 3.6.24-2 lpr/lpd printer spooling system
ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-5 a pattern scanning and text proces
There are a lot of printer are reported works using
hpdj printer driver. However, when config with apsfilterconfig,
only 5xx and 8xx series are allowed.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 71147-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2001 19:56:59 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Wed Jan 03 13:56:59 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Du1r-0007j6-00; Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:56:59 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Dtxo-0008Rt-00; Wed, 03 Jan 2001 14:52:48 -0500
From: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
To: 71147-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#71147: fixed in apsfilter 6.0.0-1
Message-Id: <E14Dtxo-0008Rt-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 14:52:48 -0500
Delivered-To: 71147-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apsfilter, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apsfilter_6.0.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/apsfilter/apsfilter_6.0.0.orig.tar.gz
apsfilter_6.0.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/apsfilter/apsfilter_6.0.0-1.diff.gz
apsfilter_6.0.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/a/apsfilter/apsfilter_6.0.0-1.dsc
apsfilter_6.0.0-1_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apsfilter/apsfilter_6.0.0-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 71147@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org> (supplier of updated apsfilter package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:06:40 +0100
Source: apsfilter
Binary: apsfilter
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description:
apsfilter - Magic print filter with automatic file type recognition
Closes: 65831 70943 70955 71147
Changes:
apsfilter (6.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version. Closes: Bug#65831, Bug#70955, Bug#71147.
* Configuration incompatible with previous versions; a warning is
displayed on upgrade (using debconf) and old configuration files
are backed up.
* Closer to FHS compliance; all changes needed for full compliance
have been made transparent using symbolic links. README.Debian no
longer necessary.
* debian/apsfilterconfig.8: Obsoleted by man/apsfilter.1.
* Orphaning.
* Handle systems where there is no /etc/printcap. Closes: Bug#70943.
* /etc/apsfilter is not included directly in the package to avoid
spurious `directory not empty so not removed' warnings from dpkg.
* debian/postinst: Don't call apsfilterconfig since it doesn't use
debconf yet.
* debian/rules: Install only the files installed by the upstream
Makefile.
* Conforms to Standards version 3.2.1.
Files:
cc9ea403c1ecd4d2f8ef1c931b5d2bc5 730 text extra apsfilter_6.0.0-1.dsc
87659e8d803dda316ce3793b13e8f1bc 302742 text extra apsfilter_6.0.0.orig.tar.gz
3e9675aa7f09523ab6e6315647d1a3be 7183 text extra apsfilter_6.0.0-1.diff.gz
376b28cfaeee371cae09f7733ba205ae 291270 text extra apsfilter_6.0.0-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQCVAwUBOlNBZuz+R+WhGHJJAQFkpgP/YDV402l1wiMQu4kxGJXaU8hE6r8xZUzi
LGWU3xvzE0Fcl/1yw2LiJefRiiDoxUXikw8gE2nlrjyr9sj5ewnov5pmDdqWASAF
oxcEiu4jGLitPgrMaGt06ozIEOzMeWSHRD26AfyNsDq7WnmXdaJwtkHdn8GhNPxE
ToX7OMT060k=
=RLPq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: