[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#44255: marked as done (this package is not native)



Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500
with message-id <E14B0BU-0004MU-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#44255: fixed in grafix 1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 1999 03:22:55 +0000
Received: (qmail 14054 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 03:22:54 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO kitenet.net) (63.193.116.241)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 03:22:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 30324 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 1999 03:22:20 -0000
Date: 5 Sep 1999 03:22:20 -0000
Message-ID: <19990905032220.30321.qmail@kitenet.net>
From: joey@kitenet.net
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: this package is not native

Package: grafix
Version: debian unstable as of 4 Sep 99

It seems that grafix is not really a debian native package; examination
of the copyright file shows that the sources for it were obtained from
elsewhere, not written by a debian developer. And yet, in the debian
archive, there is only a grafix.tar.gz, not a grafix.orig.tar.gz.

Any package that's not a native package is supposed to have a .orig.tar.gz
file and an accompanying .diff.gz file that contains any debian changes.
(See section 3.3 of the policy manual for details.) This has a number of
benefits, including letting people see what changes were made for debian,
and making it easy to apply those changes to new upstream versions of the
package.

Please download the pristine upstream source of grafix, and use it to
create a .orig.tar.gz file, and then rebuild your package with
"dpkg-buildpackage -sa" so that the .orig.tar.gz file will be uploaded to
the debian archive.


(I realize there might be situtations where doing that is not possible, or I
may have misidentified your package as having this problem when it is really
a native package. If so, simply close this semi-autogenerated bug report.) 
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44255-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2000 20:17:21 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Tue Dec 26 14:17:21 2000
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14B0XA-0001d7-00; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:17:20 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14B0BU-0004MU-00; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500
From: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
To: 44255-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#44255: fixed in grafix 1.6-1
Message-Id: <E14B0BU-0004MU-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500
Delivered-To: 44255-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
grafix, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

grafix_1.6-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6-1.dsc
grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz
grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb
grafix1_1.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix1_1.6-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 44255@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org> (supplier of updated grafix package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:58:39 +0100
Source: grafix
Binary: grafix1 grafix-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Description: 
 grafix-dev - Development library and header files for grafix
 grafix1    - scientific visualization library
Closes: 44255 50097 60796 62013 72221 74860
Changes: 
 grafix (1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Maintainer set to Debian QA Group.
   * The QA Group acknowledges the previous NMU (Closes: #50097).  Thanks!
   * New upstream release.  The upstream maintainer decided to go with
     the LGPL without any further restrictions (Closes: #74860).  Also,
     various compilation problems are solved (Closes: #72221).
   * Package is indeed not Debian native (Closes: #44255).
   * Added Build-Depends line.
   * All documentation is under /usr/share/doc now (Closes: #60796).
   * Updated Standards-Version.
   * Permissions of examples directory are fixed (Closes: #62013).
   * Improved debian/copyright.
   * Removed the emacs config directives from debian/changelog.
   * Made the package a proper library (i.e. created a -dev package).
Files: 
 a6e87478b260396106da02bb37249383 582 math optional grafix_1.6-1.dsc
 2394c25abe13a8c489d75667d80ec3aa 301517 math optional grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz
 453571c8cb709665b579c9a3dfea0482 96986 math optional grafix1_1.6-1_i386.deb
 62871ef45f0f332b1d1922180b203789 291652 math optional grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjpCt2MACgkQKb5dImj9VJ8TLQCbB/TEe3s85ytJXi50HEoM3TsD
Hz0An3E6ddBFi58ski8af8NWpswGVafw
=lacs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: