On 00-09-29 Lindsay Haisley wrote: > Thus spake Christian Kurz on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:34:17AM CDT > > On 00-09-28 Lindsay Haisley wrote: > > > Package: unknown > > > > Not corrct, should be general. > > > > > Version: Debian > > > > Argh, this is no version numer, do you mean this serious? > My original post specified Debian 2.2. The numerals got stripped somewhere > along the way. Sorry if the usage on this field was out of spec. I wasn't > sure what to specify since I don't know what package did the deed. Then you can stil assign it to the package general so that people get notified and give as version-numer 2.2. > > > I upgraded a production slink system last night to Debian 2.2. At some > > > point in the install, a process went through /etc/passwd and made at least > > > one gratuitous change which it should never have made. > > > > > The entry for user majordom, required by the majordomo list server, was > > > changed from; > > > > > majordom:x:30:31:Majordomo:/var/qmail/majordomo:/bin/sh > > > > > to > > > > > majordom:x:30:31:Majordomo:/usr/lib/majordomo:/bin/sh > > > > I assume this was done by update-passwd, but for update-passwd to make > > this change, you either have made the upgrade without watching and the > > swtich -y to apt-get or you have manually have to enter y for > > update-passwd to change the passwd. Are you certain, that you manually > > upgraded? If not and the upgrade once done with apt-get -y, then I have > > to say, that this is no problem for debian. > I updated packages using apt from within dselect, auto-installing everything > that needed to be updated via transfers from the debian ftp site. Lots of > package install scripts asked a lot of questions, as usual, and I kept a > record on another virtual terminal of those messages which appeared to be Apperead? How can you say if something appers to be important or not? I see no one do this automatically. This has always to be done by manual reading. > mission-critical to the upgrade. At no point do I remember being asked if I > wanted to overwrite any information in /etc/passwd. I know that the mysql Look at the code of base-passwd.postinst and see what's done in it. You will also notice that update-passwd gets only executed if the admin who does the upgrade says y at the prompt. Otherwise no changes will be done. > circulstances should any package, update-passwd or any other, muck with > passwd file entries which are unrelated to the system or to currently > installed packages. Period! While Debian may advise the use of a certain When do you understand the update-passwd gets _only_ executed when _you_ as the admin make this decision and either call it from the commandline or say y in the postinst-script? > > > Both qmail and majordomo are installed on this system compiled from source > > > (not from packages), and I don't believe there's even a Debian package for > > > majordomo at all. > > > > What? When did you look for the last time at the package list? > A search through the Debian package list in dselect for "majordomo" and for > the partial words "major" and "domo" turns up nothing, and I just tried it Hm, then the packages has not only been removed in woody, but also potato. If you upgraded, you had slink and slink contained a majordomo-package, which you will find in the package list of slink, if they didn't remove it there also. > > > My majordomo lists (one of which is commercial) have been down all day until > > > one astute list subscriber wrote me personally with the details of the > > > bounce message she received and I was able to spot the problem. > > > > What? You administrate a mailing-list and need one day to find out that > > the setup is broken? I'm happy that I'm not subscribed to any of the > > list you administrate, because I expect a mailing list admin to notice > > any error after some (normally 3-4 hours). > This is none of your business, nor of anyone else at Debian, and your > comment is inappropriate. But then don't tell us that the update went smooth and you check everything (including the mailserver as you wrote on debian-qa) and saw no problems. How can you say that you saw no problems after the upgrade, when a user notices after a day that the mailserver is broken? Please get your facts right, before you blame debian for things that debian is not responsible for. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpFGDoxMrffC.pgp
Description: PGP signature