Bug#68916: marked as done (tkmail: should depend on tk8.0 and tcl8.0 but doesn't.)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.NEB.4.21.0009122207540.6856-100000@gaia.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2000 01:02:38 +0000
>From shurik@math.unibas.ch Thu Aug 10 20:02:38 2000
Return-path: <shurik@math.unibas.ch>
Received: from daisy.math.unibas.ch [::ffff:131.152.41.1]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13N3Da-0000Iy-00; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:02:38 -0500
Received: from louie.math.unibas.ch by daisy.math.unibas.ch (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id DAA08209; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 03:02:33 +0200
Received: from shurik by louie.math.unibas.ch with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 13N3Ed-0000jb-00; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 03:03:43 +0200
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 03:03:43 +0200
From: Alexander Shumakovitch <shurik@math.unibas.ch>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tkmail: should depend on tk8.0 and tcl8.0 but doesn't.
Message-ID: <20000811030343.A2824@louie.math.unibas.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tkmail
Version: 4.0beta9-4
Severity: normal
ldd shows that mfv_wish (which tkmail runs on execution) is explicitly
compiled against tk8.0 and tcl8.0 libraries:
$ ldd mfv_wish
libtk8.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libtk8.0.so.1 (0x4001d000)
libtcl8.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libtcl8.0.so.1 (0x400d1000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40139000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40156000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x401f8000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x401fc000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
Yet tkmail depends only on wish and this dependency is satisfied as soon as
tk8.2 is installed.
Thanks!
--- Alexander.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flanker 2.2.15 #1 Sun Aug 6 18:55:08 CEST 2000 i686
Versions of packages tkmail depends on:
ii tk8.0 [wish] 8.0.5-6 The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
ii tk8.2 [wish] 8.2.3-2 The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68916-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2000 20:13:23 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Tue Sep 12 15:13:23 2000
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [::ffff:129.187.176.79]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13YwQk-0006rB-00; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:13:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 7321 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2000 20:13:19 -0000
Received: from gaia.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.73)
by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 12 Sep 2000 20:13:19 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-Sender: bunk@gaia.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
To: 37508-done@bugs.debian.org, 50826-done@bugs.debian.org,
53519-done@bugs.debian.org, 53884-done@bugs.debian.org,
58447-done@bugs.debian.org, 60281-done@bugs.debian.org,
61629-done@bugs.debian.org, 62286-done@bugs.debian.org,
68418-done@bugs.debian.org, 68916-done@bugs.debian.org,
69363-done@bugs.debian.org, 70537-done@bugs.debian.org,
71097-done@bugs.debian.org, 71328-done@bugs.debian.org,
69842-done@bugs.debian.org, 70761-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: These bugs are already fixed
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0009122207540.6856-100000@gaia.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 68916-done@bugs.debian.org
These bugs are already fixed.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: