Bug#58072: 1.02-3.1 ==> 1.02-3.1: post-install error: couldn't read file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english/bash/main.template"
Package: dotfile-bash
Version: 1.02-6
Severity: normal
Upgrading 'bash.*' includes dotfile-bash:
Preparing to replace bash 2.02.1-1.4 (using .../base/bash_2.03-5.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement bash ...
Setting up bash (2.03-5) ...
(Reading database ... 55096 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace bash-builtins 2.01.1-4.1 (using .../utils/bash-builtins_2.03-5.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement bash-builtins ...
Selecting previously deselected package bash-doc.
Unpacking bash-doc (from .../doc/bash-doc_2.03-5.deb) ...
Preparing to replace dotfile 1:2.3b1-0.1 (using .../utils/dotfile_2.4-1.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dotfile ...
Preparing to replace dotfile-bash 1.02-3.1 (using .../utils/dotfile-bash_1.02-6.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dotfile-bash ...
Setting up bash-builtins (2.03-5) ...
Setting up bash-doc (2.03-5) ...
Setting up dotfile (2.4-1) ...
Setting up dotfile-bash (1.02-6) ...
Byte compiled Dotfile modules run significantly faster.
Do you want to:
1. automatically bytecompile Dotfile modules as they get installed,
2. pick which Dotfile modules to bytecompile yourself, or
3. completely skip automatic bytecompilation of all Dotfile modules?
Choose from 1, 2, or 3: 1
All Dotfile modules will be bytecompiled automatically.
couldn't read file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english/bash/main.template": no such file or directory
while executing
"source [lindex $argv 1]/main.template"
(file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/Generator/dotfile.tcl" line 128)
dpkg: error processing dotfile-bash (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
dotfile-bash
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux titus 2.0.36 #2 Sun Feb 21 15:55:27 EST 1999 i686
Versions of packages dotfile-bash depends on:
ii dotfile 1:2.4-1 Easy configuration of popular prog
Reply to: