On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 04:14:53AM +0100, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote:
> On Fri, 2000-02-11 at 20:47:50, Michael-John Turner wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 11:01:02AM +0100, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote:
> > > pop-3\t\tstream\ttcp\tnowait\tcyrus\t/usr/sbin/tcpd\t/usr/sbin/pop3d
> > I think there's a problem with your /etc/services - my machines have a pop3
> > service but not a pop-3 one.
They should have a pop-3 one --- pop-3 is what it's been forever; pop3 is
the official IANA name for it, but that's only been in /etc/services since
netbase 3.16-1.
From /etc/services:
pop3 110/tcp pop-3 # POP version 3
pop3 110/udp pop-3
Note that having pop-3 after 110/tcp just means it's an alias for the port
name.
> You're right, thanks. Bastards must have changed it lately ;-) This
> probably remained from slink - I occasionally add own entries to
> /etc/services so do not upgrade the file every time. But I suggest you check
> cucipop.postinst then. It's all stuffed with 'pop-3' strings. There's still
> some inconsistency there. I send Cc: to cucipop maintainer then.
HTH.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpSI06EVJt85.pgp
Description: PGP signature