Bug#46572: marked as done (netbase: netbase: can't upgrade when xinetd installed)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 1999 06:40:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 24588 invoked from network); 4 Oct 1999 06:40:36 -0000
Received: from mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl (156.17.14.89)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 1999 06:40:36 -0000
Received: (from kwasniak@localhost)
by mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id IAA24736;
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 08:40:33 +0200
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 08:40:33 +0200
Message-Id: <199910040640.IAA24736@mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl>
From: mirek@zind.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl
Subject: netbase: netbase: can't upgrade when xinetd installed
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.4
Package: netbase
Version: 3.16-3
Severity: important
Hi,
I have xinetd:
ii xinetd 2.2.1-8.SD1.1 replacement for inetd with many enhancements
and it's some trouble with netbase upgrade:
$ dpkg -i netbase_3.16-3_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 45409 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace netbase 3.16-3 (using netbase_3.16-3_i386.deb) ...
Stopping portmap daemon: portmap.
Unpacking replacement netbase ...
Setting up netbase (3.16-3) ...
update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/inetd: file does not exist
dpkg: error processing netbase (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
netbase
because:
diversion by xinetd from: /etc/init.d/inetd diversion by xinetd to:
/etc/init.d/inetd.real
Mirek
--
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux mirek 2.2.12 #1 Mon Aug 30 18:01:45 CEST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages netbase depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii tcpd 7.6-1 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilities
--- Begin /etc/init.d/inetd (modified conffile)
Config file not present or no permissions for access
--- End /etc/init.d/inetd
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45602-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (jrodin@161.53.2.130)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from jrodin@localhost)
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <jrodin@public.srce.hr>
To: 31500-done@bugs.debian.org, 35166-done@bugs.debian.org,
36809-done@bugs.debian.org, 37134-done@bugs.debian.org,
38361-done@bugs.debian.org, 41386-done@bugs.debian.org,
41568-done@bugs.debian.org, 43161-done@bugs.debian.org,
44099-done@bugs.debian.org, 44529-done@bugs.debian.org,
44537-done@bugs.debian.org, 45602-done@bugs.debian.org,
46572-done@bugs.debian.org, 46603-done@bugs.debian.org,
49398-done@bugs.debian.org, 49438-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: