Re: bugsquash NMU of base-files
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
> > > Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
> > > or a
> > > Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
> > >
> > > They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12), which doesn't exist yet.
> >
> > It does now, so I don't think it is worth to reupload bash and libreadlineg2.
> >
> > Please, report a (single, if possible) bug against all those other things
> > in base-files you don't like (for example, poor English grammar), and I
> > will try to fix them in 2.1.13 (or just drop me a note).
>
> I currently see a base-files 2.1.12 in Incoming/REJECT, but no reason
> file, why this upload failed ...
>
> Santiago, do you make a new upload, [...]
I've just copied 2.1.12 back to Incoming.
If it is not installed I want to know why. dinstall -d does not work
for me. Is dinstall broken?
Thanks.
--
"16c74b545056712fdf74481d0353d242" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: