[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugsquash NMU of base-files



On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Santiago Vila writes:
>  > On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
>  > 
>  > > Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
>  > > Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
>  > > or a
>  > > Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
>  > > 
>  > > They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12), which doesn't exist yet.
>  > 
>  > It does now, so I don't think it is worth to reupload bash and libreadlineg2.
>  > 
>  > Please, report a (single, if possible) bug against all those other things
>  > in base-files you don't like (for example, poor English grammar), and I
>  > will try to fix them in 2.1.13 (or just drop me a note).
> 
> I currently see a base-files 2.1.12 in Incoming/REJECT, but no reason
> file, why this upload failed ...
> 
> Santiago, do you make a new upload, [...]

I've just copied 2.1.12 back to Incoming.

If it is not installed I want to know why. dinstall -d does not work
for me. Is dinstall broken?

Thanks.


-- 
 "16c74b545056712fdf74481d0353d242" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: