Re: Is dome maintained?
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 01:57:21PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> $ lintian /var/cache/apt/archives/dome_4.60-1.2_i386.deb
> E: dome: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> E: dome: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> E: dome: binary-without-manpage dome
> E: dome: binary-without-manpage dxftopov
> W: dome: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/doc/
> $
>
> I would like to update it, would an NMU be appropriate? The last maintainer
> upload was 4 Nov 1996, the initial release.
These are not release-critical issues.
Also, I've already got a bug report (#46904) filed against lintian for
its reporting on this issue.
Personally, I don't think the qa team should migrate any packages from
fsstnd to fhs till after potato is released. You're talking about making
changes to most packages for a non-release-critical issue, and that's
just asking for problems. [And the policy on this isn't even ready.]
The binary-without-a-manpage issue is less clear cut.
--
Raul
Reply to: