Re: removing gopher
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client.
> > It's another to distribute a non-free server.]
>
> I am not sure what you mean? Is a non-free server really bad?
E.g. if a root exploit is made for a non-free server, we couldn't
be able to properly fix it, in time, especially if the license
doesn't allow any modifications[1] and upstream authors are dead...
[1] I don't know if this applies to gopherd.
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: