[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: is the cfs package orphaned?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:46:08 +1000
> From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
> To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: is the cfs package orphaned?
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:12:17AM -0500, Johnie Ingram wrote:
> > Also, it installs the wrong binary as "cmkdir".  Apparently no one
> > has used this package in 3 years besides me, and I'm powerless to fix
> > it.  :-(
> 
> It seems to be abandoned upstream too, so I think I'll just forget it
> as Ray suggests, and perhaps package one of the newer equivalents.
> 

</LURK>
	Another thing to consider with the cfs package is the fact it
seems to be phased out with the development of TCFS which can be located
at http://tcfs.dia.unisa.it which I had originally thought about packagin
up for my own use but decided against as it required updates to e2fsprogs,
shadow and mount and because of being in the US it I couldn't package it
because of export laws...

	Respectfully,
	Jeremy T. Bouse

<LURK>

,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
|Jeremy T. Bouse - Software Engineer for Netsurfer, Inc. -  www.Netsurfer.com |
|     PGP ID/Fingerprint: 1024/E83D9AE5/4ACC03F098D78198 19D0593E50E597E9     |
|   Public PGP key available by sending email with 'send pgpkey' in subject   |
|  undrgrid@UnderGrid.net   -   NIC Whois: JB5713   -   Jeremy@Netsurfer.com  |
|           The world is coming to an end ... SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!!!            |
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNwK4+uak13roPZrlAQH5vgP/TpT9dksRj01KOVb9h7UF+soflu2UYCSc
2X457jI8pZs42gYjOHkFqGmHxjaBB7Yw28NDWdmmxJ8QLRoG6J5e/ornk6qEFY1y
gbD85bs5H60IyvBxEkvDP+p31eQRookWquf/j8E1wUMSSUPvYPIbGVNNu3LfBVrm
NpchQkHQucQ=
=NHE3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: