Bug#49438: marked as done (xinetd: netstd is now a dummy package, please depend on the individual packages you need)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 1999 08:18:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 8685 invoked from network); 7 Nov 1999 08:18:08 -0000
Received: from mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl (root@156.17.14.89)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 1999 08:18:08 -0000
Received: (from kwasniak@localhost)
by mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id JAA01753;
Sun, 7 Nov 1999 09:17:59 +0100
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 09:17:59 +0100
Message-Id: <199911070817.JAA01753@mirek.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl>
From: mirek@zind.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl
Subject: xinetd: netstd is now a dummy package, please depend on the individual packages you need
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6.1
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8.SD1.2
Severity: important
netstd has been broken into smaller packages. netstd itself is a dummy
package
which depends on these pieces. Declaring a depends on netstd forces one to
install bits a sysadmin may not need or want. Also, netstd will remove other
daemons in favor of its own.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux mirek 2.2.13 #1 Thu Oct 21 08:49:59 CEST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages xinetd depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii netbase 3.16-3 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 49438-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (jrodin@161.53.2.130)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from jrodin@localhost)
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <jrodin@public.srce.hr>
To: 31500-done@bugs.debian.org, 35166-done@bugs.debian.org,
36809-done@bugs.debian.org, 37134-done@bugs.debian.org,
38361-done@bugs.debian.org, 41386-done@bugs.debian.org,
41568-done@bugs.debian.org, 43161-done@bugs.debian.org,
44099-done@bugs.debian.org, 44529-done@bugs.debian.org,
44537-done@bugs.debian.org, 45602-done@bugs.debian.org,
46572-done@bugs.debian.org, 46603-done@bugs.debian.org,
49398-done@bugs.debian.org, 49438-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: