On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991220125838.8261A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
Ah, I was confusing the install announcements with the upload
announcements. I found it.
> > Do you intend to incorporate the changes I made in my NMU or should I just
> > forget about them?
>
> I incorporated many of them in 2.1.13. Thank you.
>
> You should probably forget about the others.
Which ones did you discard? All of my changes were meritorious.
> I welcome NMUs for fixing
> grave bugs like the one base-files had this weekend, but they have to
> follow the guidelines: You *have* to contact the maintainer by email no
> matter how urgent the bug may be ("I'm going to upload this if you don't
> answer this email before next dinstall run" is enough for me),
I told you, for the purposes of the BugSquash, the prior notice requirement
was waived by the Project Leader and the Release Manager. If you have a
problem with that, take it up with them, not me.
> and you
> don't have to make any other extra change other than the rc-bug you intend
> to fix.
I did you a favor by correcting other problems in your package.
--
G. Branden Robinson | The first thing the communists do when
Debian GNU/Linux | they take over a country is to outlaw
branden@ecn.purdue.edu | cockfighting.
roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks
Attachment:
pgp0x7CwErUGn.pgp
Description: PGP signature