[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded wily 0.13.41-0.2 (source i386) to master



I've never done a debian-qa upload before, but my understanding is that
anyone on the list can make fixes and uploads.  I found a bug in wily that
was trivial to fix, so I fixed it in the cleanest way I could see -- a
request for comments posted to -devel didn't turn anything up.  Hopefully
what I did is right.

If anything is not 100% correct in what I did, please let me know
immediately (before next dinstall) so I can scrap the files from Incoming
right away!

thanks.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:35:57 -0700
Source: wily
Binary: wily
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.13.41-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Ono <wmono@debian.org>
Description: 
 wily       - A work-alike of the Acme programming environment for Plan 9
Closes: 40511
Changes: 
 wily (0.13.41-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Now installs Doc/perl.txt, Doc/FAQ.txt, Doc/changes.txt
     (Closes: #40511)
Files: 
 a363c5b4139ffe4b6af5c8ee447c96a6 801 editors optional wily_0.13.41-0.2.dsc
 1a5b37f9ed0c17b0917a46544677db26 9582 editors optional wily_0.13.41-0.2.diff.gz
 4c9d43d7678029706b8c87396741f69a 154110 editors optional wily_0.13.41-0.2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBN6JDRDZejXGTumr9AQH/NAgAshru8/1JKp9P1unhOtgxHUNauL3qITwV
dp3TY2AM7YFhqB0aMWAWyRA31XcZBYE7erqCvWMbUXkSLe34Tn/2uTZ/G8DMOWV1
PMFGkTfrjL9kBeDpOtVcOPRQh3onNLImuiv1fQvczsF2EmEgQHee6/pOQV/9Ci+d
bd5xvTyQZ/hZvIkpBz06lF5kJOc2s7oA+XrsvUQdtO1OmDpYXhMWR/oIz4L0FRCh
pF6O3ehHhorIrL85j5gUlCCoFHkPBnId4rP4G75iLte/N9lPjfxibOSNTabP56Tu
+8qJswYc4gtF3pP8AM+aaAm97Owu7JE7zUpq4t83U1ZWq33BFcXGtA==
=lmUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
William Ono <wmono@debian.org>                             PGP key: 0x93BA6AFD
 fingerprint = E3 64 C5 43 3E B3 2D A6  C6 D7 E3 45 90 24 78 DE = fingerprint
PGP-encrypted mail welcome!           "640k ought to be enough for everybody."


Reply to: