Re: /bin/csh link
On Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 12:20:31PM +0100, Luis Francisco Gonzalez wrote:
> It has been brought to my attention that there is a link /bin/csh being
> set up by tcsh/csh using update-alternatives. The main problem is that
> this link is stale until after /usr is mounted. And of course there is the
> fact that neither should be used for scripting. If some admin wants to put
> this link, I don't have a problem with that but I would prefer debian would
> not do it.
>
> In any case I'd like to coordinate/discuss this with you.
csh appears to be unmaintained (maintainer == debian-qa@lists.debian.org).
Is csh scripting really that bad? If allowable, then both csh and tcsh
would have to be moved to /bin.
If not allowed, then /bin/csh link might still be required for non-Debian
compatibility. But then, the admin could create it themselves as you say.
The stale link doesn't seem very useful.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
Reply to: