On 99-12-17 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > debian-qa-private??? Yes, this is the list of the Debian QA comittee. I cc'ed them the email, because I think they could be intested to read this. > Previously Christian Kurz wrote: > > this would meant, that we don't have a good coordination as I suggest to > > dark on debian-qa? > dark will be there (well, at least during his daytime anyway). Oh, there was'nt a statement about this in your first email. > > We won't have a team, dark and one or two people from the QA-comittee for > > coordination? > dark and I will be coordinating things as long as we're online; for the > other times people from the QA-team are free to help coordinating as > well. Free to help? No real organisation through the whole time? I have the feeling the many bugs will be taken more then two times and so we won't get number of RCBs really down. > > If so, this party won't be very effective (This is my impression from the > > last bug-squashing partys). > They were pretty effective, a lot of work that was done just wasn't=20 > very visible directly. Hm, so after this party we will still have more then 300 RCBs open? It's not important to get a good organisation and those RCBs closed? Sorry, but then I don't will help at this bug-squashing partys. Sometimes I have the feeling no one is interested in getting this number down. :/ Ciao Christian -- ******************************************************************** * Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team * * Use Debian - a free Operating System * ********************************************************************
Attachment:
pgpLiCKmseMMh.pgp
Description: PGP signature