Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 26, 1999
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bugscan@debian.org, Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>, Debian QA Comittee <debian-qa-private@lists.debian.org>, Debian Private <debian-private@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 26, 1999
- From: Francesco Tapparo <cesco@ntt.it>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 17:40:45 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19991128174045.B640@ntt.it>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bugscan@debian.org, Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>, Debian QA Comittee <debian-qa-private@lists.debian.org>, Debian Private <debian-private@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: cesco@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19991127172145.C21939@jupiter.rhein-neckar.de>; from shorty@debian.org on Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100
- References: <19991126031503.A6112@master.debian.org> <[🔎] 19991127172145.C21939@jupiter.rhein-neckar.de>
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Package: scwm (main)
> > Maintainer: Francesco Tapparo <cesco@debian.org>
> > 50395 scwm: recompile for libguile6
>
> Francesco, when will you recompile it or can we NMU it?
The reason of the delay is not the recompile (this is trivial to fix, and my
local scwm package is already linked against libguile6), but a
modularization of the debian config file and a better integration with the
upstream configuration file.
libguile4 is in the archives yet, so I decided to not upload an "only
recompiled" scwm.
Of course I can change my mind, if you like so.
--
Francesco Tapparo | cesco@debian.org
fight for your software freedoms: www.fsf.org | tapparo@mat.unimi.it
Reply to: