Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2025 12:40:00 +0000 with message-id <[🔎] E1vU2RE-000oP9-2M@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1121581: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #314741, regarding hugs -98 accepts "(*2+1)"; Report section 3.5 says it shouldn't to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 314741: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: hugs-bugs@haskell.org, submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: hugs -98 accepts "(*2+1)"; Report section 3.5 says it shouldn't
- From: sacrificial-spam-address@horizon.com
- Date: 18 Jun 2005 06:45:32 -0000
- Message-id: <20050618064532.22160.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Package: hugs Version: 98.200503.08-1 While having fun exploring the language, I discovered something unexpected: Hugs interprets (*2+1) as as (*(2+1)), in contravention of http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/exps.html#sect3.5 # Syntactic precedence rules apply to sections as follows. (op e) is # legal if and only if (x op e) parses in the same way as (x op (e)); # and similarly for (e op). For example, (*a+b) is syntactically invalid, # but (+a*b) and (*(a+b)) are valid. Because (+) is left associative, # (a+b+) is syntactically correct, but (+a+b) is not; the latter may # legally be written as (+(a+b)). A couple of examples, including specifically the one that the Report says is syntactically invalid: __ __ __ __ ____ ___ _________________________________________ || || || || || || ||__ Hugs 98: Based on the Haskell 98 standard ||___|| ||__|| ||__|| __|| Copyright (c) 1994-2005 ||---|| ___|| World Wide Web: http://haskell.org/hugs || || Report bugs to: hugs-bugs@haskell.org || || Version: 20050308 _________________________________________ Haskell 98 mode: Restart with command line option -98 to enable extensions Type :? for help Hugs.Base> (*2+1) 6 18 Hugs.Base> let a=2; b=3 in (*a+b) 5 25 If you're going to offer the extension, I think it needs to be justified why (*a+b) is not the same as (\x -> x*a+b)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 294830-done@bugs.debian.org,299568-done@bugs.debian.org,299570-done@bugs.debian.org,314741-done@bugs.debian.org,347172-done@bugs.debian.org,422170-done@bugs.debian.org,442073-done@bugs.debian.org,461569-done@bugs.debian.org,493516-done@bugs.debian.org,513391-done@bugs.debian.org,1030231-done@bugs.debian.org,1075073-done@bugs.debian.org,907114-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: hugs98@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1121581: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 12:40:00 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1vU2RE-000oP9-2M@fasolo.debian.org>
Version: 98.200609.21-7+rm Dear submitter, as the package hugs98 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1121581 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---