Bug#637066: marked as done (Should this package be removed?)
Your message dated Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:02:36 -0500
with message-id <CAAajCMZd_=oo3GXyW6=xMfimx6WZFErHZ-pBB_XfyLsLe6tDUA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#637066: [wnpp] removal of gramofile has been requested!
has caused the Debian Bug report #637066,
regarding Should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
637066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637066
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
On 7 August 2011 15:31, Daniel Kobras <kobras@linux.de> wrote:
> Gramofile is also unmaintained upstream, and can only use OSS output. With only 32 popcorn votes, and OSS slated for removal in the next release, just removing the gramofile package would be even easier, and the more likely solution.
As requested by maintainer in bug #636885.
Kind regards,
--
Tim Retout <diocles@debian.org>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 637066-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#637066: [wnpp] removal of gramofile has been requested!
- From: Jeremy Bícha <jbicha@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:02:36 -0500
- Message-id: <CAAajCMZd_=oo3GXyW6=xMfimx6WZFErHZ-pBB_XfyLsLe6tDUA@mail.gmail.com>
I'm closing this bug since it doesn't look like we are trying to
remove this package currently.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
--- End Message ---
Reply to: