[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1004589: marked as done (GNUnet daemon doesn't start successfully)



Your message dated Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:19:29 +0000
with message-id <E1vJrpx-00Bpf1-05@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1004589: fixed in gnunet 0.20.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004589,
regarding GNUnet daemon doesn't start successfully
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004589: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: gnunet
Version: 0.15.3-4
Severity: important

I installed the gnunet package and the GNUnet daemon probably didn't start successfully. I haven't change any config files.

"# service gnunet status" on a Debian Sid system reports:

gnunet.service - A framework for secure peer-to-peer networking
    Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/gnunet.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
    Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2022-01-30 19:54:54 CET; 30min ago
   Process: 448 ExecStart=/usr/bin/gnunet-arm -s -c /etc/gnunet.conf (code=exited, status=217/USER)
       CPU: 1ms

Jan 30 19:54:54 debian systemd[1]: Starting A framework for secure peer-to-peer networking...

Jan 30 19:54:54 debian systemd[448]: gnunet.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Jan 30 19:54:54 debian systemd[448]: gnunet.service: Failed at step USER spawning /usr/bin/gnunet-arm: No such process
Jan 30
19:54:54 debian systemd[1]: gnunet.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=217/USER
Jan 30
19:54:54 debian systemd[1]: gnunet.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Jan 30
19:54:54 debian systemd[1]: Failed to start A framework for secure peer-to-peer networking.


I belief that this behavior is not intended.

I first backported the package for myself to my Bullseye system and tested it there. It probably has similar problems to the original package from unstable. After that I installed the package on a freshly installed (Debian 11 without GUI) and upgraded (to Unstable) VM. The GNUnet daemon seems not to work out of the box there too I guess.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnunet
Source-Version: 0.20.0-8
Done: Syed Shahrukh Hussain <syed.shahrukh@ossrevival.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnunet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1004589@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Syed Shahrukh Hussain <syed.shahrukh@ossrevival.org> (supplier of updated gnunet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 12:51:27 +0500
Source: gnunet
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 0.20.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Syed Shahrukh Hussain <syed.shahrukh@ossrevival.org>
Closes: 1004589 1096741
Changes:
 gnunet (0.20.0-8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fixed service startup problem (Closes: #1004589).
   * Added patch to fix gcc-15 build failure (Closes: #1096741).
   * Updated Standards-Version from 4.7.0 to 4.7.2.
Checksums-Sha1:
 0c206d342aac8bbe44894ca92e0f8d2cd710dfce 2460 gnunet_0.20.0-8.dsc
 9a288de14b07e819e857ec71b2dea9b5a1e8b6ab 72604 gnunet_0.20.0-8.debian.tar.xz
 0b195549879a101f8c37d6379daade8628d73f3f 16372 gnunet_0.20.0-8_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 53ba7b8e4d23b091fe45c68b1bc1c04f1fc76d772def178e57e51fb822a911b7 2460 gnunet_0.20.0-8.dsc
 9349ed4e387abcdcaf19d9c720eabdc146fc409dd5e78ae64dad863bfeff286f 72604 gnunet_0.20.0-8.debian.tar.xz
 067630c66d75ba96b9c33632f8ed98d30bdeabbdaeed8dda945eda9dbb1da8ed 16372 gnunet_0.20.0-8_source.buildinfo
Files:
 9cd589cafd36839849ef235c224faf86 2460 net optional gnunet_0.20.0-8.dsc
 eabdfc352edb3f2e10ff59374ca3f6c4 72604 net optional gnunet_0.20.0-8.debian.tar.xz
 be024226414357f53ae9682ddc121a5a 16372 net optional gnunet_0.20.0-8_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=z3gU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpnWwHSmPstG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: