[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1108538: marked as done (tup: autopkgtest depends on removed package unionfs-fuse)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:50:37 +0000
with message-id <E1v8lyf-00AHaB-2N@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1108538: fixed in tup 0.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108538,
regarding tup: autopkgtest depends on removed package unionfs-fuse
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1108538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: tup
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie-ignore

Hi,
I happened to run into the fact that the autopkgtest of src:tup fails in unstable and testing. It fails because one of the test dependencies has been removed in 2024. Failing tests on amd64 and arm64 are considered RC [1].
With my Release Team member hat on I have tagged this as trixie-ignore as it's so late in the freeze and it's not worth removing the package from trixie because of this at this moment. Having said that, if a fix is possible without fully removing the autopkgtest and without making the test superficial, it's still welcome, but it would need to happen soon. 

Paul

[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: tup
Source-Version: 0.8-2
Done: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1108538@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> (supplier of updated tup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:40:55 +0200
Source: tup
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Closes: 1108538
Changes:
 tup (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload
   * Drop need of unionfs-fuse (Closes: #1108538)
Checksums-Sha1:
 272f369dc9dfb4ae1c2c9ae0a02399b3a479c156 2125 tup_0.8-2.dsc
 56633be79d4bc6ce15c35ab13955ac17a1bf81a7 10108 tup_0.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 f690d96683cb5466816de5d978635b129fd1be38 7139 tup_0.8-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 d30abae6c9773cecba267cb1691275b3544f65a95b38045649066d307c326cc2 2125 tup_0.8-2.dsc
 eb97d25537d03a18824a8972cae8c97cd723b6cb57ea8cfde0d81d851196aa5f 10108 tup_0.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 2b600af2095b3ae031415a10a7a2118020d950d2e93e35265d38a74bcbde0054 7139 tup_0.8-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 6f7da8a32f9aaca6381310de1267069b 2125 devel optional tup_0.8-2.dsc
 c388d4acf5354972a017cf0a5e1fca8b 10108 devel optional tup_0.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 20db776120d87681ebd5105bbdfb0c56 7139 devel optional tup_0.8-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkpeKbhleSSGCX3/w808JdE6fXdkFAmjutYQACgkQ808JdE6f
XdmI7w//U9iQJYzxc4A4itn3oSmfBs5NvVEdnjIVhi03EsKXCkwaI/xAjeSme2w8
lp8uP8Amm4D7hniaQE4mDhCkGHI270z8dhVyh7AR/7IPFqJ81y50iGdS1FF25IlO
LRfs3mz9XWG0BqLy6QMHfG8WNyoRysJDmnGbUBefxWR+0Klc4vEhahubywLS53Dq
JOT6cHn950X3FtV+RGZ7amfsKL5hU8/23J1dxURUa0T0lwsUuhoCtaMQs1u7AI3D
a59lbT9lQ/jqqJ3Y2/1/gpUng5wEPRtu+txifW62wMY0UaxsWiR+3podzXUSCkou
e6K1pDKyTE6QkXs/Iar47fKvQm5tYnbK7IeCP6a9ClpqV5rNIx8rWcCTX2wrJWXY
IEUmaePR0zmCEm0IE2/L0nJ09l7IxXeuyS+j7l3TYlmM9d7KdYZX6JAabMvAH20M
ivOgH5//hWbaiciJsTKtPL6Mytqqv6zGn9QO7I+mQionk6jwezAqv01l5AD9DcWN
QkTnNuudzFCW6YvMM84lFKSd5wivtV7jS5ZgEXipNcmfULsu9CmA6S5slCLhm7qR
KvPcsYrlzHoDD8YxFzTyZOvlX8FEem9y/7zwXMm/2ePxD++tIoJuRLj89fGXKnB4
V4Xt5+HO/ep6Gfm+wgRJR49gwqBqHOc2jTCW8UxLyUYEd4Xd8yo=
=3mIr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgp9AMx9XsT7i.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: