[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1058684: marked as done (Packages zfs-dkms and zfs-fuse are mutually problematic)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:01:26 +0000
with message-id <E1tM1Y6-002Mjs-8y@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1058684: fixed in zfs-linux 2.2.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058684,
regarding Packages zfs-dkms and zfs-fuse are mutually problematic
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1058684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058684
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: zfs-fuse
Version: 0.7.0-25+b1
Severity: minor

As illustrated in for example [1], to have installed both the kernel
module and the FUSE versions of ZFS is problematic, as the two are at
very different versions (0.7 and 2.1 respectively) and zfs-fuse has
limited support for many features added in the interim.

There does, however, currently not seem to be anything preventing
doing so by mistake on Debian Bookworm, resulting in unclear errors
and potentially an inability to access data by normal means until the
situation is resolved by the administrator.

Please consider setting up the packages so as to make installing both
the OpenZFS and ZFS-FUSE implementations on the same system difficult,
possibly by adding mutual Breaks: to the packages in question.

NOTE: This bug report probably applies equally to both zfs-dkms AND
zfs-fuse; however, I don't see any simply way to lodge the same bug
report against more than one package, hence reporting the bug against
the package the installation of which risks causing a more immediate
problem. (Importing an older pool when using a newer ZFS
implementation is generally unproblematic; importing a newer or
upgraded pool using an older ZFS implementation can be problematic
depending on usage, as illustrated for example in [1] and other
messages in that discussion thread.)

[1]: https://zfsonlinux.topicbox.com/groups/zfs-discuss/T0da7a33c149662c3-Mc947472dad70a87b15616ef6

-- 
Michael Kjörling

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: zfs-linux
Source-Version: 2.2.7-1
Done: Shengqi Chen <harry-chen@outlook.com>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zfs-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1058684@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Shengqi Chen <harry-chen@outlook.com> (supplier of updated zfs-linux package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 01:31:52 +0800
Source: zfs-linux
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian ZFS on Linux maintainers <pkg-zfsonlinux-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Shengqi Chen <harry-chen@outlook.com>
Closes: 1058684 1084964 1089488 1089578
Changes:
 zfs-linux (2.2.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Aron Xu ]
   * d/control: Breaks zfs-fuse (Closes: #1058684)
 .
   [ Shengqi Chen ]
   * New upstream version 2.2.7 (Closes: #1089578, #1089488, #1084964)
   * Refresh existing patches & symbol control files
   * d/rules: skip installing upstream removed files
   * d/copyright: remove superfluous files
   * d/control: add zfs-fuse version to Breaks
Checksums-Sha1:
 e28ef8171fa4a7bbf5c0d40fb5ba26b7367c53e1 3273 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.dsc
 2e1ffe81c7082f1c5f2db14571f621b4e0cddbe6 33852602 zfs-linux_2.2.7.orig.tar.gz
 09590d90df920291f457ce8f9bd49cfc614326e7 107364 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.debian.tar.xz
 3eb874524565d3619605845078d62d9cd3a5f7c3 8475 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 dda131108aac79fc3f656d8ee071e17bf69c1930b40bdd9a5689ec41ae3a10c8 3273 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.dsc
 b2b8e3bfabf2a6407a0132243726cb6762547a5bd095b1b1f37eaf2a9d8f7672 33852602 zfs-linux_2.2.7.orig.tar.gz
 3f194c2d89ee1f6ad8fed2b5af3f4d7ad76c658c4947bc4940336fd672494f0a 107364 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.debian.tar.xz
 77871afeb4b3e815908be71db3e287ba482ffc506f3fa8df16266307491903ff 8475 zfs-linux_2.2.7-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 f565cc92ebdc11b23149cba6fcff08c5 3273 contrib/kernel optional zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.dsc
 25d3e7afe00e04abe2c795cf644070af 33852602 contrib/kernel optional zfs-linux_2.2.7.orig.tar.gz
 f646c892ceacf6dcd6196f700228c52a 107364 contrib/kernel optional zfs-linux_2.2.7-1.debian.tar.xz
 e0d6988c3f869816f9241f43183ce6b1 8475 contrib/kernel optional zfs-linux_2.2.7-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBLHAyuu1xqoC2aJ5NP8o68vMTMgFAmdb6uEACgkQNP8o68vM
TMjpyQf/eUDp6UQa/lz+94jfw/6w+SOwhlr1BCnDR7S3ztQhJ85NAQfrc+TDa4xW
y0NeuWKzmTvMx39t2gR6zJok/cFEAm7paR69XkmVgCsyDwJSMal5Wg16gKtSWO6D
t0gKriBbbji7uVx3FqXaPlrunlNh4dJLD1uOQ6MeuPDW2VLFYyZ+zx/5USXFd8wH
pzxMHYkWOlICx4dnW0ML88Arj82iTWo6+GNcavl9p3id29m2vqeRSnECdDWhC2ZC
rRfZqITzkS5PojiuegJrKgR5ehwtqc7LsZI5Nql/PoahzZeiMJR/KnG5DoRPRi7j
i5j/kVzJXVVTZbNoZ6H1tIpWBKhlRQ==
=rctL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpV0dhKiVuVa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: