Bug#955588: marked as done (keepassx: description says "install keepassx instead")
Your message dated Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:59:19 +0100
with message-id <2109AE25-1056-4722-9E07-1DCD08D3D4D6@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: keepassx: description says "install keepassx instead"
has caused the Debian Bug report #955588,
regarding keepassx: description says "install keepassx instead"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
955588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: keepassx: description says "install keepassx instead"
- From: ydirson@free.fr
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 23:24:11 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <182836355.781710055.1585862651079.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7>
- In-reply-to: <908080194.781706296.1585862540511.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7>
Package: keepassx
Version: 2.0.3+git20190121.1682ab9-2.1+b1
The description explain that keepassxc is better than keepassx, but still says
"install keepassx instead". It is highly confusing :)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 955588-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: keepassx: description says "install keepassx instead"
- From: Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:59:19 +0100
- Message-id: <2109AE25-1056-4722-9E07-1DCD08D3D4D6@mailbox.org>
Version: 2.0.3+keepassxc1
This bug is fixed in the meantime.
The keepassx package now is an empty transitional package, depending on
keepassxc.
With this, the package description has also been changed.
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
--- End Message ---
Reply to: