[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#596735: marked as done (sleepd: add option for idle time on battery with sleeping disabled)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:00 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1sKdcW-00FyGs-31@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1073968: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #596735,
regarding sleepd: add option for idle time on battery with sleeping disabled
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sleepd
Version: 2.02
Severity: wishlist

First, sleepd is an excellent contribution to Debian!


I often leave my computer busy for long periods of time, and I run the usual
$ sleepctl off
before and
$ sleepctl on
after so that the system does not sleep based on n seconds idle time.

However, my laptop is frequently in environments where power is not certain, 
especially where maybe an outlet is controlled by a switch or my laptop may be 
unplugged accidentally.  In the case of power being disconnected, I want sleepd 
to be reactivated rather than waiting for the battery to be drained.  I have 
overcome this by a shell fragment that checks for AC power and reactivates 
sleepd if it is disconnected.

If sleepd had an option like --off-battery then it could be set to the amount 
of idle time, on battery, after running 'sleepctl off', before sleepd would 
suspend the system.  The value 0 could be used as a default to disable this 
feature.

Just a suggestion of course; thanks.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (750, 'stable'), (700, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages sleepd depends on:
ii  libapm1                       3.2.2-14   Library for interacting with APM d
ii  libc6                         2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdbus-1-3                   1.2.24-3   simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libhal1                       0.5.14-3   Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii  lsb-base                      3.2-23.1   Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip

Versions of packages sleepd recommends:
ii  hal                           0.5.14-3   Hardware Abstraction Layer
ii  pm-utils                      1.3.0-2    utilities and scripts for power ma

sleepd suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/sleepd changed:
PARAMS="--unused 300 --ac-unused 7200 --battery 8 -E"


-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.11+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package sleepd has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1073968

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: