[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1066688: marked as done (ng: FTBFS: dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:50:20 +0000
with message-id <E1ruwgu-00Aliu-5E@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066688: fixed in ng 1.5~beta1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066688,
regarding ng: FTBFS: dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ng
Version: 1.5~beta1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lucas@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o dir.o dir.c
> dir.c: In function ‘ensurecwd’:
> dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   127 |           rchdir(curbp->b_cwd); /* ensure we are in the current dir */
>       |           ^~~~~~
>       |           vchdir
> dir.c: At top level:
> dir.c:136:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>   136 | changedir(f, n)
>       | ^~~~~~~~~
> dir.c: In function ‘changedir’:
> dir.c:136:1: warning: type of ‘f’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
> dir.c:136:1: warning: type of ‘n’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
> dir.c: At top level:
> dir.c:213:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>   213 | showcwdir(f, n)
>       | ^~~~~~~~~
> dir.c: In function ‘showcwdir’:
> dir.c:213:1: warning: type of ‘f’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
> dir.c:213:1: warning: type of ‘n’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [<builtin>: dir.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/ng_1.5~beta1-10_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ng
Source-Version: 1.5~beta1-11
Done: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ng, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066688@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> (supplier of updated ng package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:24:49 +0200
Source: ng
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5~beta1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Closes: 1066688
Changes:
 ng (1.5~beta1-11) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
     (Closes: #1066688)
Checksums-Sha1:
 542b074346ffb4b8d0dc823d010baa6be1302d19 1984 ng_1.5~beta1-11.dsc
 c707f4a74d6d21a03f5180bab2f74283cd488c92 77132 ng_1.5~beta1-11.debian.tar.xz
 340c7b27c9c22667925e3183ac900fc5143a0f04 5782 ng_1.5~beta1-11_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9508bc25b08ddab70affcf8ae5ea8a94b33c78ee1958e5c062c8e902e9788055 1984 ng_1.5~beta1-11.dsc
 c11cfb8311b37110cbc7c11d0947b023ba9af5b3a6b463365e2eaa2cad06661f 77132 ng_1.5~beta1-11.debian.tar.xz
 fc2a39b78e95e79b384ca61623193355fa49ff46bcef11b9508f567b35eaa1b0 5782 ng_1.5~beta1-11_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e699b0889095672ea4f6c742b3cc2c9c 1984 editors optional ng_1.5~beta1-11.dsc
 1fe95d40b5689ab48898403612f55e1a 77132 editors optional ng_1.5~beta1-11.debian.tar.xz
 0331bb409e2835e4601b5ac45d912569 5782 editors optional ng_1.5~beta1-11_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE6/MKMKjZxjvaRMaUX7M/k1np7QgFAmYYAVIQHGFuYmVAZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBfsz+TWentCCHuD/sHedEXu6L1lt0PmQ+lZo590hGUJAdWV/Bh
0HxWC2tMBi437iICBhEU39AVf+mUNWY6KuydbMiBQ/SAwKSoPhburborpvDIiPSu
f11+PQmx/+C4587yvi/QCg/iuyo7MbUKCHDE78QY123piBSDJtj1k2dr696xDQhk
1xulUV2trEb31VZycfeiwAMH5yHzEAsaOSanLgABn2jYVTWyy8+X2gk3QLV/Wt9a
+JspTuZRnaVc6NPy9YqaD8M391RBnw/9/uAGbILuT/SkckGxctmsaJYtJFFBWcSU
D4zSiMcZoDLfdkqeBFQY7BqiYW8gROH2l4eWgp/Xasajj1ioYeQD0KQqm3Od0XO5
M4BgHXUh61dmiD8PipciBaJmAGwmbjJWZmyuLnRbaQs4uC0AeofPbmC9fZdFRftj
eglJLXu21UKhKCbaVSYfAU0vEAfkgG+0ftsQvoFJoAf3zjGwKuzgzOb9QzV8jHjd
GtsOnFTCxrsmiyUJ8hsqhBDDgTRapdGES9jQaIOEuRRUa7Hr3g0cD3bkvFS2LaY4
wX7VFb2VvnlxpVT/33PwzbanjIYXBxdoJMHPqaaJ3dxHHv5wSi40uMf8k53RGMBE
L6VuXGMDiWuEHaytOGquGBBd72YJODiOyvXL0RaLMuZl3MZRPuolCPgIGCRzO38L
ugdkgyg7Lw==
=s94+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpvNF7wfZeQi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: