Question regarding time_t transition
Dear fellow developers,
I was about to file two bug reports (one against libdb5.3 and one
against perl-base) but instead of wasting everybody's time, I'd like to
ask first, since I couldn't find the information anywhere.
Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64" and
missing the "Provides: <package_without_64>" for affected architectures
like armhf ? Or are they intentional and we should wait for the package
to be tested/ready/whatever ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
--
Raphaël Halimi
Reply to: