[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#841957: marked as done (libgs9-common: URW fonts: Missing glyphs for uk language)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:47:37 -0600
with message-id <2208071.NgBsaNRSFp@riemann>
and subject line Re: libgs9-common: URW fonts: Missing glyphs for uk language
has caused the Debian Bug report #841957,
regarding libgs9-common: URW fonts: Missing glyphs for uk language
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
841957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libgs9-common 
Version: 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u3 
Severity: normal 

Dear Maintainer, 

In ghostscript-9.06 present in Jessie repository there are no Ukrainian and 
Russian glyphs in a number of fonts. Namely, in all the URW family. 

These fonts are invisible in LibreOffice, for example. 

I checked it using the following command: 

$ fc-validate -l uk /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh 
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh:0 Missing 72 
glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for uk language 

$ fc-validate -l ru /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh 
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh:0 Missing 66 
glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for ru language 

I reported this bug upstream: 
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697224 

however, they answered that everything is allright in the newer Ghostscript 
version, and the only way to get this working is to upgrade to the lates 
version. 




-- System Information: 
Debian Release: 8.6 
  APT prefers stable 
  APT policy: (500, 'stable') 
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) 

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) 
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) 
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash 
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) 

libgs9-common depends on no packages. 

Versions of packages libgs9-common recommends: 
ii  fonts-droid  1:4.4.4r2-6 

libgs9-common suggests no packages. 

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello,

I am sorry that no timely action was taken on your report.  However, as of 
2024, the oldest version shipping in Debian is 9.27 and the upstream bug you 
opened indicates things were fixed in 9.20.

Moreover, I checked the coverage remains present in ghostscript 10.02.1 
(below), so closing this bug.

$ fc-validate -l uk  /usr/share/ghostscript/10.02.1/Resource/Font/URWBookman-
Light
/usr/share/ghostscript/10.02.1/Resource/Font/URWBookman-Light:0 Satisfy the 
coverage for uk language

$ fc-validate -l ru  /usr/share/ghostscript/10.02.1/Resource/Font/URWBookman-
Light
/usr/share/ghostscript/10.02.1/Resource/Font/URWBookman-Light:0 Satisfy the 
coverage for ru language

-Steve

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:33:04 +0300 v_2e@ukr.net wrote:
> Package: libgs9-common 
> Version: 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u3 
> Severity: normal 
> 
> Dear Maintainer, 
> 
> In ghostscript-9.06 present in Jessie repository there are no Ukrainian and 
> Russian glyphs in a number of fonts. Namely, in all the URW family. 
> 
> These fonts are invisible in LibreOffice, for example. 
> 
> I checked it using the following command: 
> 
> $ fc-validate -l uk /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-
Ligh 
> /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh:0 Missing 72 
> glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for uk language 
> 
> $ fc-validate -l ru /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-
Ligh 
> /usr/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh:0 Missing 66 
> glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for ru language 
> 
> I reported this bug upstream: 
> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697224 
> 
> however, they answered that everything is allright in the newer Ghostscript 
> version, and the only way to get this working is to upgrade to the lates 
> version. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information: 
> Debian Release: 8.6 
>   APT prefers stable 
>   APT policy: (500, 'stable') 
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) 
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) 
> Locale: LANG=uk_UA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) 
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash 
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) 
> 
> libgs9-common depends on no packages. 
> 
> Versions of packages libgs9-common recommends: 
> ii  fonts-droid  1:4.4.4r2-6 
> 
> libgs9-common suggests no packages. 
> 
> -- no debconf information 
> 
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: