Bug#1064435: gthumb: please package new upstream 3.12.5
Package: gthumb
Version: 3:3.12.4-1~bpo12+1
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Upstream released 3.12.5 on Februrary 18th 2024. Could you please package it?
Martin-Éric
PS: a backport to Bookworm would also be appreciated. :)
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fi:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages gthumb depends on:
ii gsettings-desktop-schemas 43.0-1
ii gthumb-data 3:3.12.4-1~bpo12+1
ii libbrasero-media3-1 3.12.3-2
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u4
ii libcairo2 1.16.0-7
ii libcolord2 1.4.6-2.2
ii libexiv2-27 0.27.6-1
ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14
ii libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 2.42.10+dfsg-1+b1
ii libgl1-mesa-dri 22.3.6-1+deb12u1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.74.6-2
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 1.22.0-3+deb12u1
ii libgstreamer1.0-0 1.22.0-2
ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.38-2~deb12u1
ii libheif1 1.15.1-1
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:2.1.5-2
ii libjxl0.7 0.7.0-10
ii liblcms2-2 2.14-2
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.50.12+ds-1
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.50.12+ds-1
ii libpng16-16 1.6.39-2
ii libraw20 0.20.2-2.1
ii librsvg2-2 2.54.7+dfsg-1~deb12u1
ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
ii libtiff6 4.5.0-6+deb12u1
ii libwebp7 1.2.4-0.2+deb12u1
ii libx11-6 2:1.8.4-2+deb12u2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1
gthumb recommends no packages.
gthumb suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=kvh7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: