[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#273521: marked as done ([alpha] gs: Error: /rangecheck in --.image3-- for images with transparency)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2024 19:28:58 -0600
with message-id <6010797.lOV4Wx5bFT@riemann>
and subject line Re: gs-esp: Fails with every document from Konqueror
has caused the Debian Bug report #273521,
regarding [alpha] gs: Error: /rangecheck in --.image3-- for images with transparency
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
273521: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=273521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gs-esp
Version: 7.07.1-9
Severity: important

I have a HP LaserJet 6MP, a printer that can use PostScript or PCL.  I
have configured it in CUPS as PostScript before and have been trying to
make it work with PCL.  It can print most documents (eg, PDFs) fine with
PCL (using foomatic/hpijs), but it always fails on Konqueror printouts.

I am seeing this in my cups error_log:

D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:00 -0500] [Job 621] foomatic-gswrapper: gs
'-dPARANOIDSAFER' '-dNOPAUSE' '-dBATCH' '-sDEVICE=ijs' '-sIjsServe
r=ijsgimpprint' '-dIjsUseOutputFD'
'-sDeviceManufacturer=HEWLETT-PACKARD' '-sDeviceModel=pcl-4'
'-dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612' '-dDEVIC
EHEIGHTPOINTS=792' '-r300x300' '-sProcessColorModel=DeviceGray'
'-sIjsParams=Quality=300dpi,MediaSource=Standard,Dither=VeryFast,I
mageType=2,Density=1.000000,Brightness=1.000000,Gamma=1.000000,Contrast=1.000000,Saturation=1.000000,Cyan=1.000000,Magenta=1.00000
0,Yellow=1.000000' '-sOutputFile=| cat >&3' '/dev/fd/0' 3>&1 1>&2
D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:00 -0500] [Job 621] ESP Ghostscript 7.07
(2003-07-12)
D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:00 -0500] [Job 621] Copyright 2003 artofcode LLC
and Easy Software Products, all rights reserved.
D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:00 -0500] [Job 621] This software comes with NO
WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:01 -0500] [Job 621] Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font
from /var/lib/defoma/gs.d/dirs/fonts/n019003l.pfb... 2694832
 1216893 2155264 692652 0 done.
 D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:01 -0500] [Job 621] Loading NimbusSanL-Bold font
 from /var/lib/defoma/gs.d/dirs/fonts/n019004l.pfb... 2808848
  1333793 2397472 812019 0 done.
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Error: /rangecheck in
  --.image3--
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Operand stack:
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] --dict:4/4(L)--
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Execution stack:
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] %interp_exit   .runexec2
  --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %sto
  pped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
  false   1   %stopped_push   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3   %opar
  ray_pop   1   3   %oparray_pop   .runexec2   --nostringval--
  --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringv
  al--   --nostringval--   1   3   %oparray_pop   --nostringval--
  --nostringval--
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Dictionary stack:
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] --dict:1062/1417(ro)(G)--
  --dict:0/20(G)--   --dict:197/200(L)--
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Current allocation mode is
  local
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] Last OS error: 2
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] ESP Ghostscript 7.07.1:
  Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] renderer return value: 1
  D [26/Sep/2004:13:51:02 -0500] [Job 621] renderer received signal: 1

Printing the same document using the Postscript mode on the printer
works fine.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4-rc2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gs-esp depends on:
ii  gs-common              0.3.6             Common files for different Ghostsc
ii  libc6.1                2.3.2.ds1-16      GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsimage2          1.1.20final+rc1-7 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10    1.1.20final+rc1-7 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libgimpprint1          4.2.7-3           The Gimp-Print printer driver libr
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.4.6-2           The GLib library of C routines
ii  libjpeg62              6b-9              The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpaper1              1.1.14-0.4        Library for handling paper charact
ii  libpng12-0             1.2.5.0-7         PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5             1:3.3.4-12        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4               3.6.1-1.1         Tag Image File Format library
ii  libx11-6               4.3.0.dfsg.1-7    X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6               4.3.0.dfsg.1-7    X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt6                 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7    X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-7    X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.1.2-1       compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:59:26 -0600 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just realized this was on alpha (sloppy reading on my part, I know).
> I'm attaching the test document.  Maybe some alpha porter or
> interested DD on a porterbox could try it out (like so: "gs -dSAFER
> print.ps")?

Thirteen years on, and with no action taken, I'm closing this bug.  There is 
no longer an official alpha porter box so I am not in a position to verify if 
the bug still remains.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: