Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:58:13 -0600 with message-id <6639722.GXAFRqVoOG@riemann> and subject line Re: gs-common should be in oldlibs has caused the Debian Bug report #483086, regarding gs-common should be in oldlibs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 483086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483086 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: gs-common should be in oldlibs
- From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 00:16:06 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805270013480.3913@cantor.unex.es>
Package: gs-common Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 It would be really helpful if this package were in section oldlibs, because that way deborphan would list it automatically among the packages that may be removed automatically because they are no longer needed. Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 483086-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gs-common should be in oldlibs
- From: Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:58:13 -0600
- Message-id: <6639722.GXAFRqVoOG@riemann>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805270013480.3913@cantor.unex.es>
On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:16:06 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote: > Package: gs-common > Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 > > It would be really helpful if this package were in section oldlibs, Package gs-common no longer exists.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---