[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033182: TuxCommander: The tuxcmd.desktop file is missing an additional category 'Core'



Package: tuxcmd
Version: 0.6.70+dfsg-3
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello!

The desktop file for Linux/Debian (/usr/share/applications/tuxcmd.desktop) is missing the additional category: 'Core'.
Alternativly possible may be the category 'FileManager'.

For further information please see the documentation about desktop files here:
<https://specifications.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apas02.html>

As a file manager one of this additional category should be added. I recommend 'Core' more than 'FileManger'.

- --
Yours sincerely
Joerg Schiermeier



- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de:en_GB:es
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: OpenRC (via /run/openrc), PID 1: init

Versions of packages tuxcmd depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0          2.46.0-5
ii  libc6                2.36-8
ii  libcairo2            1.16.0-7
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0  2.42.10+dfsg-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.74.6-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0          2.24.33-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.50.12+ds-1

tuxcmd recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tuxcmd suggests:
pn  tuxcmd-modules  <none>

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: This was created by GnuPG for Linux.

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEERMHJSMoKBiNrvtXJodFQ9YsO8GMFAmQWc98ACgkQodFQ9YsO
8GN2xw/+NetHK1PxPJ7+CTg7E4DgoU7vYmuj/+uwN9Ro8W4qfSOSKDQL8m9RnfY+
sbcHJYkmidscUP5/dvcVFXxge18RjrvKD8bIXbnKONOL+L3Tc5tmK9rkY9n/j7rS
C+V9STaejv6g75QwB0TDZzDHSsW7VBF5HFsDzdtsoDp8hbSjxlBrVP71qfpFW6aw
h/IEPP3AKrOkb90hd3oiOywPn4NNBfZeRbENz8Lw0VTJC551lBtEeIYY+e7BGJ15
jWhqbSoyMivaz6xr8HjU15qFANpuAr/k+TLHkz/rOYareI2jEjUFlg404IZLLNk7
MT6/kQM22mIkHnJ0De2wpQj3gu3ylAxKikdVtzFes+f0TlKN5Wf/9F78v9e5KfxP
atbkxzQHuVH0pDgJNl+yCi9h4tAOiiv6GryT/3xk2IN3a3NJMXMS1vWIUfB134hc
ZM3OqkBCbc8NaaGR6+cVLRuZe0EMNcDj52DxdFxegbYTh83+snyJsBVoVK0cnj3Z
5VHYRi0mDhGhTWXpk3CWW6cgbsqeP257ui0ocB/wKsdvKbl5ykubkYDcG3rP+BIY
KUmeI5Gp23mLVIL54N1j0inu3tG9YOzjwzqp14IhMf+MIsYYkIEMEwaMSu6QIJwq
WbpWus4/+xjLXfOrI14/dUx6e3XHx8UVF4Fnvob0AQXaZM4bzEA=
=C9/x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: