Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg00005.html
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers.
> >
> > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and added a note to README.Debian.
> > The new package now depends on fluid-soundfont-gm, see
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tuxguitar/
> >
> > The package builds and runs on amd64 and in Qemu for arm64. It looks pretty good to me now.
> > Maybe someone can take a look and upload it?
> > If there is anything more I can do, just let me know.
>
> Hello Helmar,
>
> I am reviewing the updated package now and will either sponsor an upload
> if everything looks good or provide feedback.
The update looks great! I have updated debian/copyright to document
the files that are licensed under a license other than the LGPL, but
otherwise everything looks good. I will upload today.
For the time-being, I will push the updated sources and tag to the
current java-team repo [1], but we may want adjust that before the
bullseye release since the package is no longer team-maintained.
Thank you for your work on this!
tony
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tuxguitar
Reply to: