Bug#1028142: dlocate: cannot find recent files - obsolete database?
Package: dlocate
Version: 1.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
dlocate cannot find recent files, so it is mostly useless.
I suspect that since the upgrade to dlocate 1.12 on 2022-11-25,
its database is no longer updated:
zira:~> ll /var/lib/dlocate
total 109172
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 55750318 2022-11-25 00:27:44 dlocatedb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 55623054 2022-11-14 09:47:51 dlocatedb.old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 105318 2022-11-25 00:27:44 dlocatedb.stamps
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 299199 2022-11-25 00:27:44 dpkg-list
The changelog doesn't mention any change:
dlocate (1.12) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
* Convert to 3.0 source format. Closes: #1007667
-- Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:10:50 +0100
The cron file /etc/cron.daily/dlocate is there, though:
#!/bin/sh
# update databases for both files and packages.
if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-dlocatedb ] ; then
/usr/sbin/update-dlocatedb -b
fi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages dlocate depends on:
ii dctrl-tools [grep-dctrl] 2.24-3+b1
ii dpkg 1.21.17
ii perl 5.36.0-6
Versions of packages dlocate recommends:
ii supercat 0.5.7-1
dlocate suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: