[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1055078: autoproject: autopkgtest fails since texinfo 1.7



Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest fails since texinfo 7.1

On 10/30/23 23:53, Hilmar Preusse wrote:

Hi all,

No, I don't have a patch for this yet. I'll try to look into this, but can'
promise anything.

Patch is attached, tagging.

H.
--
Testmail

diff -Nru autoproject-0.20/debian/changelog autoproject-0.20/debian/changelog
--- autoproject-0.20/debian/changelog	2021-10-01 02:19:30.000000000 +0200
+++ autoproject-0.20/debian/changelog	2023-11-01 23:35:44.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+autoproject (0.20-15) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Don't use @setfilename in TeXInfo file, if file is included.
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>  Wed, 01 Nov 2023 23:35:44 +0100
+
 autoproject (0.20-14) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * QA upload.
diff -Nru autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/40_not_use_setfilename_when_include.patch autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/40_not_use_setfilename_when_include.patch
--- autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/40_not_use_setfilename_when_include.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/40_not_use_setfilename_when_include.patch	2023-11-01 22:41:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+--- autoproject-0.20.orig/lib/all/all/all/gpl.texinfo
++++ autoproject-0.20/lib/all/all/all/gpl.texinfo
+@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+-@setfilename gpl.info
++@comment @setfilename gpl.info
+ 
+ @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+ @center Version 2, June 1991
diff -Nru autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/series autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/series
--- autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/series	2021-10-01 02:19:30.000000000 +0200
+++ autoproject-0.20/debian/patches/series	2023-11-01 22:42:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 10_fix-manpage.patch
 20_modernize-AC_INIT.patch
 30_remove_@refill_command.patch
+40_not_use_setfilename_when_include.patch

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: