Bug#1051568: gthumb: please package 3.12.3
Package: gthumb
Version: 3:3.12.2-3+b1
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
3.12.3 was just released upstream. Could you please package it and then backport it to stable?
Thanks!
Martin-Éric
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-11-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fi:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages gthumb depends on:
ii gsettings-desktop-schemas 43.0-1
ii gthumb-data 3:3.12.2-3
ii libbrasero-media3-1 3.12.3-2
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u1
ii libcairo2 1.16.0-7
ii libchamplain-0.12-0 0.12.20-1+b1
ii libchamplain-gtk-0.12-0 0.12.20-1+b1
ii libclutter-1.0-0 1.26.4+dfsg-4
ii libclutter-gtk-1.0-0 1.8.4-4+b1
ii libcolord2 1.4.6-2.2
ii libexiv2-27 0.27.6-1
ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14
ii libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 2.42.10+dfsg-1+b1
ii libgl1-mesa-dri 22.3.6-1+deb12u1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.74.6-2
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 1.22.0-3+deb12u1
ii libgstreamer1.0-0 1.22.0-2
ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.37-2
ii libheif1 1.15.1-1
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:2.1.5-2
ii liblcms2-2 2.14-2
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.50.12+ds-1
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.50.12+ds-1
ii libpng16-16 1.6.39-2
ii libraw20 0.20.2-2.1
ii librsvg2-2 2.54.7+dfsg-1~deb12u1
ii libsecret-1-0 0.20.5-3
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.74.3-1
ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
ii libtiff6 4.5.0-6
ii libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 2.40.5-1~deb12u1
ii libwebp7 1.2.4-0.2
ii libx11-6 2:1.8.4-2+deb12u1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1
Versions of packages gthumb recommends:
ii libgphoto2-6 2.5.30-1
ii libgphoto2-port12 2.5.30-1
gthumb suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=3Oq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: