[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686134: marked as done (package descriptions incorrect, package content outdated )



Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2023 01:13:55 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1qAgzL-009EAJ-Ru@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1037951: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #686134,
regarding package descriptions incorrect, package content outdated 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:manpages-pt
Version: 20040726-4
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org


Dear Maintainers,

as the date in the version string indicates, manpages-pt und manpages-pt-dev
are outdated. The Linux man-pages project is quite active (1), the grouping of
the manual pages has changed (2).

Thus the descriptions of manpages-pt (3) and manpages-pt-dev (4) are wrong as
well as the package descriptions are outdated/incorrect.

Surely the descriptions have to be updated and the content has to be
rearranged.

   Description: Portuguese Versions of the Manual Pages
    These are the manpages available in Portuguese
    This package contains the following sections:
      * 1 = User programs (e.g. ls, ln)
      * 4 = Devices (e.g. hd, sd).
      * 5 = File formats and protocols, syntaxes of several system
        files (e.g. wtmp, /etc/passwd, nfs).
      * 6 = Games etc.
      * 7 = Conventions and standards, macro packages, etc.
        (e.g. nroff, ascii).


The Developer's Reference does not mandate capitalization in the SD, it is
not sure that these are *all* Portuguese translations.


Description: Portuguese Versions of the Manual Pages (dev sections)
    These are the manpages available in Portuguese
    This package contains the following sections:
      * 2 = Linux system calls.
      * 3 = Libc calls (note that a more comprehensive source of
        information may be found in the libc6-doc package).
      * 8 = Kernel functions


Same objections here plus the change of section 8.

Please consider


   Description: Portuguese manual page translations
    This package contains Portuguese manual page translations from the
    following sections:
      * 1 = User programs (e.g. ls, ln)
      * 4 = Devices (e.g. hd, sd).
      * 5 = File formats and protocols, syntaxes of several system
    files (e.g. wtmp, /etc/passwd, nfs).
      * 6 = Games etc.
      * 7 = Conventions and standards, macro packages, etc.
        (e.g. nroff, ascii).
      * 8 = System management commands.


Description: Portuguese manual page translations (development)
    These are the manpages available in Portuguese
    This package contains the following sections:
      * 2 = Linux system calls.
      * 3 = C library calls (note that a more comprehensive source of
    information may be found in the libc6-doc package).

And there is the possible policy violation (5):


If a localized version of a manual page is provided, it should either be up-to-date or it should be obvious to the reader that it is outdated and the original manual page should be used instead. This can be done either by a note at the beginning of the manual page or by showing the missing or changed portions in the original language instead of the target language.

It's quite easy to patch the manual pages (6).

If you consider to update the translations, I suggest starting from scratch,
using po4a to convert the manpages, creating a compendium and applying it to
the fresh PO files …

Cheers,
   Martin


1: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/man-pages/
2: man -LC man-pages
3: http://ddtp.debian.net/ddt.cgi?desc_id=9854
4: http://ddtp.debian.net/ddt.cgi?desc_id=66628
5: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.1
6: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567986#10

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 20040726-8+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package manpages-pt has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1037951

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: