[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007374: marked as done (nmzmail: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:26:53 +0000
with message-id <E1p1GMn-00BUEH-SD@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007374: fixed in nmzmail 1.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007374,
regarding nmzmail: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007374
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: nmzmail
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: nmzmail
Source-Version: 1.1-4
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nmzmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007374@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated nmzmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 01:13:32 +0100
Source: nmzmail
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007374
Changes:
 nmzmail (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 source format. Closes: #1007374.
Checksums-Sha1:
 61cd763b0358ff08a55ae7ad11cae50dbd72766c 1613 nmzmail_1.1-4.dsc
 3b0280466fb1bf6cca659bcd1cbfca3dfcbb51f4 4416 nmzmail_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 5f111527601076c61ed52f2647287b092b07fe75 5706 nmzmail_1.1-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 fb02adba5201e333ae0656ccc6d1f6e0f622941893fc4339a6385dba5ad1a56d 1613 nmzmail_1.1-4.dsc
 8f0f6f9f8a2bb05dcfc112f9b013ab25ffd9ebaf0cf259681cd9e9c9251cc940 4416 nmzmail_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 b2cf31eb3699fdeb93ea9e40a936b063aa776ca7c17af08766880568595dda12 5706 nmzmail_1.1-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c60e7105b062d43cb1757a466d3dac11 1613 mail optional nmzmail_1.1-4.dsc
 dc4d7eb8242f045be9a1157d664b04bd 4416 mail optional nmzmail_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 589f095423cc53b7443a2612baecd9e8 5706 mail optional nmzmail_1.1-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=CMBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: