[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007685: marked as done (blop: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:03:56 +0000
with message-id <E1oRasG-003T1E-G4@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007685: fixed in blop 0.2.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007685,
regarding blop: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007685: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007685
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: blop
Version: 0.2.8-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: blop
Source-Version: 0.2.8-8
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
blop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007685@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated blop package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:42:16 +0200
Source: blop
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.8-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007685
Changes:
 blop (0.2.8-8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) format (Closes: #1007685).
   * d/copyright: Convert to machine-readable format.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5dbe101b2031921682e68926cf6058e6be7eef50 1517 blop_0.2.8-8.dsc
 32e6c4a5b04fcfcfa7d2f602bd1aedf54e98a2b0 3828 blop_0.2.8-8.debian.tar.xz
 20969b32fecd8bbe2a48b02d05177bbc35fcced5 5525 blop_0.2.8-8_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 8779543fa7011c71673f5b814660a2355b1e962bd21f27358585e10c286b3b81 1517 blop_0.2.8-8.dsc
 adde27cfd5b31ecbe884beb7d1ed82a1e8a81148efd9d1df8749cf1232997044 3828 blop_0.2.8-8.debian.tar.xz
 8ac73663a61726765b1163cd52a916fc04a8c5bfe0bf6fbe08c904921dae2109 5525 blop_0.2.8-8_source.buildinfo
Files:
 ef42eb76ca0cd63722e7f3a24ac59814 1517 sound optional blop_0.2.8-8.dsc
 14d3aaf734669bbe0c773b483f153bf7 3828 sound optional blop_0.2.8-8.debian.tar.xz
 a57af9349ca23cc22fa0abf18a643530 5525 sound optional blop_0.2.8-8_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=6J97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: